Ah, yes. Indeed, it is an acceptable system and I wouldn't have any qualms with it if I didn't think we could do better.Which, I think, is acceptable given that it is a choice and privately run.
Ah, yes. Indeed, it is an acceptable system and I wouldn't have any qualms with it if I didn't think we could do better.Which, I think, is acceptable given that it is a choice and privately run.
yes. "good" is often the enemy of "best".what's too hard to overcome is throwing away one system for another.
yes. "good" is often the enemy of "best".
I can actually get behind this.I will not pay for your son, however I will treat his cough with herbal teas which I shall pay for.
Community healthcare, not national!!!
Horrible examples..
How about one guy growing up in a trailer, learns how to be a plumber, makes at most $50,000 a year. Another guy who grew up with a silver spoon in his mouth and was pushed through ivy league schools to become a lawyer, makes $150,000 a year. Joe the plumber want to make more but with his education, all he can do is create his own plumbing business. He gets that up and running, but is now paying himself less ($35,000) in order to keep his company afloat. After two years in, he gets t-boned in a traffic accident by someone with no insurance, and no monetary assets to sue for. He can't work for the next year, and is forced to close his business. Leaving him broke for reason beyond his control.
actually it shouldn't cost any more than normal insurance.we should chunk trillions into universal healthcare so this one off super bad luck situation never actually occurs.
actually it shouldn't cost any more than normal insurance.
actually it shouldn't cost any more than normal insurance.
People use this reasoning a lot. "We already pay taxes. What's a little more?"
That's precisely why I don't want my tax dollars increasing.I like this reasoning better: 'If we stop going to stupid and ultimately expensive wars on the back of trumped up evidence perhaps we could use our tax dollars for something actually useful and save lives instead of culling them'. How's that for reasoning?
I like this reasoning better: 'If we stop going to stupid and ultimately expensive wars on the back of trumped up evidence perhaps we could use our tax dollars for something actually useful and save lives instead of culling them'. How's that for reasoning?
I have a brilliant preposal too. If you end up with up national healthcare and you don't like it, why don't YOU leave the country? It's YOUR president and YOUR ELECTED nominees that will be choosing to have it.
That's precisely why I don't want my tax dollars increasing.
They are already being wasted.
Not sure what a preposal is... Does it involve marriage?
The US tax system doesnt work like that though. Here is details of current social security, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Insurance_Contributions_Act_tax this would be another system, added to that and regular income tax.
Since they are already fucking it up while taking 50% marginal tax (inc state) why would you give them more...
If you had a choice to spend your tax on healthcare or the recent wars, which one would you choose? Some of your administrations really sucked ass, what a shame.
would you listen to all the negative nellys in here? man.