She would put me in my place. It'd be epic.everyone gets paid and I would love to see @APRIL getting yelled at by judge judy
everyone gets paid and I would love to see @APRIL getting yelled at by judge judy
thats cause your drink was roofied.
I had a dream with you guys and us in it, we were in Australia, the time change was fucking with me, but we were at a resort drinking and having a fun time.
That's all I remember.
No way Zac will do 20+ hours of flying in a day.
I had a dream with you guys and us in it, we were in Australia, the time change was fucking with me, but we were at a resort drinking and having a fun time.
That's all I remember.
Hey @fly, do you nag for feedback on Amazon? I just got a nag demand and responded as I usually do, with 1 star.
What happened to the first amendment?I would be careful with that now. From that recent court case you can be held liable for a bad review. The vendor can sue if the feel the review is not warranted or done for a wrong reason.
What happened to the first amendment?
Giving a bad review for disliking the nagging for a review is a valid review.It's still there but it also protects business from getting shitting reviews for say someone mad that they were nagged for a review. Or a review that isn't even true.
"Item on time, as described, but they nag you for feedback."It's still there but it also protects business from getting shitting reviews for say someone mad that they were nagged for a review. Or a review that isn't even true.
"Item on time, as described, but they nag you for feedback."
I'll take your legal advice with the esteem it warrants.Not arguing with your logic but they can say they met the requirements of the transaction and didn't warrant 1 star.
I'll take your legal advice with the esteem it warrants.
There would need to be established requirements for each star level and they would need to be made clearly available to reviewers. Reviewers would also need to be clearly notified that they are required to to follow said established requirements.Not arguing with your logic but they can say they met the requirements of the transaction and didn't warrant 1 star.
Yep. I would refuse to give reviews if I could be sued because the recipient of the review disagreed with my review.Do what you want man I just saying there's a story every week on the news now of someone getting sued over a bad yelp, amazon, trip advisor, etc. There's a case at the California Supreme Court over to that they think will 100% get rid of reviews all together. So if the review is 1 star then by all means I just saying be careful of doing a bad review or a reason that really doesn't qualify.
There would need to be established requirements for each star level and they would need to be made clearly available to reviewers. Reviewers would also need to be clearly notified that they are required to to follow said established requirements.
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/l...osting-Negative-Reviews-Online-425384934.htmlYep. I would refuse to give reviews if I could be sued because the recipient of the review disagreed with my review.