Hawt First schlong transplant performed

[tre]

Artificial limbs help one restore an active life by restoring required functionality to the body. I don't find erections, or peeing standing REQUIRED functionality of the body. Nice-to-haves, sure, required, no.

Does a new leg restore the ability to walk? That's ok. Does a new hand restore the ability to cook and clean and work? That's ok. What functionality does restoring a penis do that is required to live?

I am not a fan of breasts augmentation, facial reconstruction (unless it restores lost functionality like jaw breakage, eye function, etc) or most definitely pectoral and abdominal implants. Vanity is not a good reason to undergo surgical procedures. It is your choice, I guess, but it's a shitty one.

you don't need to walk to survive, get over it and enjoy your wheelchair.
you don't need two hands to cook and clean and work. learn to clap with one hand.

 

[dbzeag]

you don't need to walk to survive, get over it and enjoy your wheelchair.
you don't need two hands to cook and clean and work. learn to clap with one hand.

If I did not have an arm or leg, foot or hand, my quality of life would suffer more than the dangers of surgery to restore that functionality. Being with or without a penis would not lower my quality of life nearly enough to warrant a transplant surgery. Even if I had ED it wouldn't lower my quality of life enough to warrant simple pill-taking.

 

[Coqui]

This pope, more than others, has been supportive of "reasonable" procreation. This is a bit of a turn from historical requests for large families. From the Vatican catechism archives: "Sacred Scripture and the Church's traditional practice see in large families a sign of God's blessing and the parents' generosity."

A lot of it is cultural as well. India has put together lots of programs for sterilization but they have been seen as the government going against the man, so other programs like condom usage and such has been ignored.

All I know is I don't understand such a surgery. What is the point? Is it for urination? If that's the case, follow what I mentioned before. Is it for aesthetics? Get over yourself, Mary. Is it for procreative reasons? That would be irresponsible as well as pointless (just do artificial insemination if you must). I just don't get the motivation.

A gay man telling people to get over themselves for aesthetics....now I've heard it all.

 

[august]

you don't get to decide what an appropriate quality of life is for other people, though.

let the man have his dick

 

[gee]

What crawled up @dbzeag's ass?

And why didn't he like it this particular time?

 

[nukes]

Wanking is a quality of life issue.
If it's not on Maslows Heirarchy, it should be.

 

[tre]

I wonder if dbzeag would feel differently if he was a top instead of a bottom?

not trying to be disrepectful at all. just wondering.

 

[hydra]

Wait, did Valve just call someone else beta?

 

[gee]

I want to assemble a team of mercenaries, or maybe some kind of killer robot, that murders people who use the term "beta" or "cuck".

 

[Hoff Kinkmeister]

I want to assemble a team of mercenaries, or maybe some kind of killer robot, that murders people who use the term "beta" or "cuck".

All you have to do is laugh at them for revealing their deep insecurities.

 

[Ledboots]

This pope, more than others, has been supportive of "reasonable" procreation. This is a bit of a turn from historical requests for large families. From the Vatican catechism archives: "Sacred Scripture and the Church's traditional practice see in large families a sign of God's blessing and the parents' generosity."

A lot of it is cultural as well. India has put together lots of programs for sterilization but they have been seen as the government going against the man, so other programs like condom usage and such has been ignored.

All I know is I don't understand such a surgery. What is the point? Is it for urination? If that's the case, follow what I mentioned before. Is it for aesthetics? Get over yourself, Mary. Is it for procreative reasons? That would be irresponsible as well as pointless (just do artificial insemination if you must). I just don't get the motivation.

Men like to have a dick and 2 balls. To lose a penis is as psychologically traumatising as losing a limb. I don't think he wants children at his age, and doubt his fertility after all he has been through, anyway.

 

[dbzeag]

I wonder if dbzeag would feel differently if he was a top instead of a bottom?

not trying to be disrepectful at all. just wondering.

Who says I am not a top?

 

[Strings]

I'd give up all 4 limbs before the penis.
My wife could still carry me around too.

 

[Duke]

To lose ones cock is akin to losing the bowsprit off a schooner.

you just can't navigate properly without it.

 

[Darth Handsome]

Losing your equipment would save you a lot of problems. Once it's gone, you probably wouldn't miss it. Look at all the married men i.e. eunuchs walking around in a daze. They've been neutered & have no idea that it even happened.

 

[nukes]

Losing your equipment would save you a lot of problems. Once it's gone, you probably wouldn't miss it. Look at all the married men i.e. eunuchs walking around in a daze. They've been neutered & have no idea that it even happened.

Nope.
I get to play with my toy.
I'd miss it.

 

[Darth Handsome]

Nope.
I get to play with my toy.
I'd miss it.

I didn't mean you, you colossal stud. I meant this other Nukes guy I know.

 

[nukes]

I didn't mean you, you colossal stud. I meant this other Nukes guy I know.

Popycock.
You've been ragging on my marriage every time I shut up for a second and stop ragging on my marriage.

 

[Strings]

I didn't mean you, you colossal stud. I meant this other Nukes guy I know.

Did you say Nukes!?!
Where?

 

[Darth Handsome]

Popycock.
You've been ragging on my marriage every time I shut up for a second and stop ragging on my marriage.

I only want what's best for you, my man.