Zone 8 motherfuckers getting started so early.
Zone 8 motherfuckers getting started so early.
In the age of Uber, you've got to be a complete moron to get a DUI
Back before madd and the safety nazis fucked everything up you didn't need to dish out a bunch of expendable income keeping the gig economy class hanging by a shoestring just to have a drink either.
Ya know, you are the first person I thought of when choosing who could possibly make a counter argument.
Even if this isn't one.
Congratulations, you're a piece of shit.Back before madd and the safety nazis fucked everything up you didn't need to dish out a bunch of expendable income keeping the gig economy class hanging by a shoestring just to have a drink either.
Congratulations, you're a piece of shit.
Last I heard, MADD has lobbied hard enough that the legal limit isn't necessarily a mark of impairment anymore.
It's not pseudoscience to establish a hard top-end limit for BAC, but still be able to show impairment enough for legal intervention at lower BACs.And there's where folks who are "all about the science" in all things all the way down to air-frying a chicken suddenly become faith-based true believers in what at best could be called pseudoscience and in some cases voodoo when it comes to this particular subject.
Congratulations.
It's not pseudoscience to establish a hard top-end limit for BAC, but still be able to show impairment enough for legal intervention at lower BACs.
That's just policy that you happen to disagree with.
id rather err on that side than the other.Last I heard, MADD has lobbied hard enough that the legal limit isn't necessarily a mark of impairment anymore.
The "real world example" is that once you blow a .08 or higher, you're donezo whether you've got the "tolerance" or not.Gonna have to show real world examples instead of just the academics of it.
There's people who are out of it at .06 and people who can function in a safe manner at twice that.
And that's still ignoring instances where somebody drank some beer but is obeying every traffic law and maneuver but gets crashed into by some fool who's so preoccupied yelling at their boy/girlfriend they're oblivious to their surroundings.
Guess who gets fucked in that scenario....
Perhaps we should just focus on dangerous drivers instead of trying to codify every last little thing that might make them dangerous...or not.
The "real world example" is that once you blow a .08 or higher, you're donezo whether you've got the "tolerance" or not.
The cop pulls you and you blow a .06, while simultaneously not passing a field sobriety test, you're done then, too. Hell, if you're so uncoordinated that you can't do it stone sober, then I don't want your stupid ass behind the wheel at all.
It's not hypocrisy or pseudoscience or anything other than a policy decision that .08 is the upper limit.
No, a person who can function at .081 doesn't negate a ceiling, you fucking numpty.There's countless examples of people who won't pass a so-called "field sobriety test" while stone cold sober. Yet according to this sobriety test they are not sober?
Face it, there is none of this that passes any scientific muster, no so-called "forensic science" does. The only thing that does is DNA, which came from the medical field.
So, seeing as you support claiming a .08 level fits everyone.......a single person who can function at .081 defeats your argument.
It's as much stupid as BMI, or military or athletics height/weight standard charts, or how petite girls with C-cups "seem" more busty than tall girls with D's.
No, a person who can function at .081 doesn't negate a ceiling, you fucking numpty.
A ceiling for everybody.A ceiling for whom? Numpty.
Even after this pandemic, I'ma need you lot to stay the fuck away.Meh, I'll drink at home. I hate bars anyway.