YAAAAY TAXES!!!
- Thread starter Sarcasmo
- Start date
Syrup Beaver
pants log
Here's an article about it from Tuesday's paper in Dallas:
Double jeopardy
AMT is making taxes twice as tough on more people
12:00 AM CST on Monday, March 13, 2006
By PAMELA YIP / The Dallas Morning News
There's a lot to hate about our federal income tax system.
It's complicated and bloated, and reforming it is a real challenge because so many special interests have stakes in it.
But no component in the tax system is more reviled than the alternative minimum tax, or AMT.
"I think it stinks," said Kenneth Sibley, a certified public accountant and managing director of Sibley & Co. in Dallas. "It is affecting more and more people, and it's in effect a flat tax."
President Bush's tax reform panel has recommended repeal of the AMT.
Most taxpayers haven't heard of the tax. But they will if Congress doesn't fix a glitch that's scooping up more average taxpayers.
Congress created the AMT in 1969 when it discovered that many affluent taxpayers were paying little or no tax by cleverly using tax deductions and credits. The intent was to ensure that the wealthy paid at least some tax.
The AMT comes with its own tax brackets and set of rules that's parallel to the regular federal income tax system.
It's triggered when a taxpayer claims large deductions such as unreimbursed employee expenses, has lots of dependency exemptions or has high local and state taxes.
Because the tax isn't inflation-adjusted, it's ensnaring more average-income taxpayers.
Under current law, about 31 million people will pay the AMT by 2010 – almost nine times as many as in 2005, according to the Tax Policy Center, which studies tax issues.
"The increase in coverage will occur in all but the very lowest income classes," said a report on the AMT published by the center last May.
For example, in 2005, 1 percent of taxpayers with income between $75,000 and $100,000 faced the AMT.
"By 2010, 49 percent of filers in that income range will pay the AMT," the center said. "The AMT will become the de facto tax system for filers in the income range of $200,000 to $500,000 – 94 percent of whom will face the tax in 2010."
At the highest income levels, the share of taxpayers paying the AMT falls because the top AMT rate of 28 percent is lower than the regular income tax's top marginal tax rate of 35 percent.
You pay the higher of the two taxes.
"For taxpayers, it means doing your taxes twice," said Mark Luscombe, principal federal tax analyst at CCH, which publishes information for tax professionals.
Calling in a pro
Because the AMT is so mind-boggling, hiring a tax professional may be worth the money.
But find a tax adviser who really knows the AMT and who can help you fend it off through careful timing of your income and deductions.
Congress tried to fix the problem by raising the AMT exemption amount – which reduces the income subject to tax – to $58,000 for couples and $40,250 for single taxpayers.
But that patch has expired.
As a result, the exemptions will fall back to $45,000 for couples and $33,750 for singles for the 2006 tax year.
Congress must act on the issue this year to give taxpayers relief, said Rep. Sam Johnson, R-Plano, of the House Ways and Means Committee.
But it won't be easy because the AMT has become a big money maker for Uncle Sam. By 2013, it will raise more revenue than the regular income tax, according to estimates by the Treasury Department.
It's too late to take steps to avoid the AMT for the 2005 tax year, but there are precautions you can take for the future.
Many items deductible under the regular tax system aren't deductible under the AMT. These include personal and dependency exemptions, the standard deduction and state income and property taxes.
If you won't be affected by the AMT this year but think you will be next year, consider accelerating certain types of deductions into this year.
For example, you might want to pay property taxes that aren't due until early next year because you can't deduct them under the AMT.
Special rules apply to medical expenses, home mortgage interest and investment interest deductions in calculating the AMT.
Personal exemptions also aren't allowed under the AMT.
A particularly vicious AMT trap lies in wait for taxpayers who exercise incentive stock options from their employers.
Holders of these ISOs are ordinarily subject to a 15 percent capital-gains tax if the underlying stock is sold within a certain time frame. For calculating the AMT, the spread between the option price and the stock's fair-market value at the time of exercise is added to your income – even if you haven't sold the stock.
What's more, "if the stock plunges in value before the holder can actually sell it and realize the hypothetical windfall, that's too bad – the AMT still has to be paid," Mr. Luscombe said.
Snared by options
That's what happened to Barbara and Jerry Cornelius of Richardson after Mrs. Cornelius exercised ISOs she was granted as an employee at a fiber optics company.
She was granted ISOs to buy stock at 6 cents a share when she joined the company in 1999. The company later went public, and the stock shot up to $295 a share.
Co-workers warned her about the AMT, but the couple's accountant assured them that "it was for the very wealthy," said Mrs. Cornelius, now at Electronic Data Systems Corp.
The accountant later came back with news that the AMT bill would be a "very, very high figure like $200,000," she said.
"We couldn't have paid that if we sold everything we had," said Mr. Cornelius, who owns an art and picture frame shop with his wife. The couple hired a new accounting firm, which recalculated the AMT bill at $95,000. They drained their savings and sold the fiber optics stock to pay that bill.
If you have ISOs, be precise about how many options you exercise and when in the tax year you do it, tax experts advise.
The Corneliuses met with Rep. Johnson to urge Congress to do something about the AMT.
"We'd like them to recognize how this has affected the average person," Mrs. Cornelius said.
Double jeopardy
AMT is making taxes twice as tough on more people
12:00 AM CST on Monday, March 13, 2006
By PAMELA YIP / The Dallas Morning News
There's a lot to hate about our federal income tax system.
It's complicated and bloated, and reforming it is a real challenge because so many special interests have stakes in it.
But no component in the tax system is more reviled than the alternative minimum tax, or AMT.
"I think it stinks," said Kenneth Sibley, a certified public accountant and managing director of Sibley & Co. in Dallas. "It is affecting more and more people, and it's in effect a flat tax."
President Bush's tax reform panel has recommended repeal of the AMT.
Most taxpayers haven't heard of the tax. But they will if Congress doesn't fix a glitch that's scooping up more average taxpayers.
Congress created the AMT in 1969 when it discovered that many affluent taxpayers were paying little or no tax by cleverly using tax deductions and credits. The intent was to ensure that the wealthy paid at least some tax.
The AMT comes with its own tax brackets and set of rules that's parallel to the regular federal income tax system.
It's triggered when a taxpayer claims large deductions such as unreimbursed employee expenses, has lots of dependency exemptions or has high local and state taxes.
Because the tax isn't inflation-adjusted, it's ensnaring more average-income taxpayers.
Under current law, about 31 million people will pay the AMT by 2010 – almost nine times as many as in 2005, according to the Tax Policy Center, which studies tax issues.
"The increase in coverage will occur in all but the very lowest income classes," said a report on the AMT published by the center last May.
For example, in 2005, 1 percent of taxpayers with income between $75,000 and $100,000 faced the AMT.
"By 2010, 49 percent of filers in that income range will pay the AMT," the center said. "The AMT will become the de facto tax system for filers in the income range of $200,000 to $500,000 – 94 percent of whom will face the tax in 2010."
At the highest income levels, the share of taxpayers paying the AMT falls because the top AMT rate of 28 percent is lower than the regular income tax's top marginal tax rate of 35 percent.
You pay the higher of the two taxes.
"For taxpayers, it means doing your taxes twice," said Mark Luscombe, principal federal tax analyst at CCH, which publishes information for tax professionals.
Calling in a pro
Because the AMT is so mind-boggling, hiring a tax professional may be worth the money.
But find a tax adviser who really knows the AMT and who can help you fend it off through careful timing of your income and deductions.
Congress tried to fix the problem by raising the AMT exemption amount – which reduces the income subject to tax – to $58,000 for couples and $40,250 for single taxpayers.
But that patch has expired.
As a result, the exemptions will fall back to $45,000 for couples and $33,750 for singles for the 2006 tax year.
Congress must act on the issue this year to give taxpayers relief, said Rep. Sam Johnson, R-Plano, of the House Ways and Means Committee.
But it won't be easy because the AMT has become a big money maker for Uncle Sam. By 2013, it will raise more revenue than the regular income tax, according to estimates by the Treasury Department.
It's too late to take steps to avoid the AMT for the 2005 tax year, but there are precautions you can take for the future.
Many items deductible under the regular tax system aren't deductible under the AMT. These include personal and dependency exemptions, the standard deduction and state income and property taxes.
If you won't be affected by the AMT this year but think you will be next year, consider accelerating certain types of deductions into this year.
For example, you might want to pay property taxes that aren't due until early next year because you can't deduct them under the AMT.
Special rules apply to medical expenses, home mortgage interest and investment interest deductions in calculating the AMT.
Personal exemptions also aren't allowed under the AMT.
A particularly vicious AMT trap lies in wait for taxpayers who exercise incentive stock options from their employers.
Holders of these ISOs are ordinarily subject to a 15 percent capital-gains tax if the underlying stock is sold within a certain time frame. For calculating the AMT, the spread between the option price and the stock's fair-market value at the time of exercise is added to your income – even if you haven't sold the stock.
What's more, "if the stock plunges in value before the holder can actually sell it and realize the hypothetical windfall, that's too bad – the AMT still has to be paid," Mr. Luscombe said.
Snared by options
That's what happened to Barbara and Jerry Cornelius of Richardson after Mrs. Cornelius exercised ISOs she was granted as an employee at a fiber optics company.
She was granted ISOs to buy stock at 6 cents a share when she joined the company in 1999. The company later went public, and the stock shot up to $295 a share.
Co-workers warned her about the AMT, but the couple's accountant assured them that "it was for the very wealthy," said Mrs. Cornelius, now at Electronic Data Systems Corp.
The accountant later came back with news that the AMT bill would be a "very, very high figure like $200,000," she said.
"We couldn't have paid that if we sold everything we had," said Mr. Cornelius, who owns an art and picture frame shop with his wife. The couple hired a new accounting firm, which recalculated the AMT bill at $95,000. They drained their savings and sold the fiber optics stock to pay that bill.
If you have ISOs, be precise about how many options you exercise and when in the tax year you do it, tax experts advise.
The Corneliuses met with Rep. Johnson to urge Congress to do something about the AMT.
"We'd like them to recognize how this has affected the average person," Mrs. Cornelius said.
Syrup Beaver
pants log
So yes, yet another tax device that doesn't hurt the rich but fucks over the middle class with a barbed hot iron poker.
Syrup Beaver
pants log
Bums ask me for money and I tell them they're better off than me and ask them for some spare change.Coqui said:
Syrup Beaver
pants log
Years ago in Boston, one of the local news agencies spied on several of the panhandlers, had footage of them getting into their brand new Land Cruisers and the like at the end of the day and everything.Coqui said:
One who actually did an interview said he was pulling in 75k a year tax free....
I owe a whole crap load and have decided to stop filing. It is not a good idea but about 3 years ago I got hit with a 1099 for the entire year of unpaid taxes. Basically for the last 3 years I havent claimed and have been 1099'ed each year. I probably owe them a good 10k, but who knows cause I just ignore it