As someone who use to do the cover band thing, so stupid a record company / publishing company would sue a local cover band like this over copyrights! Bruce Sprinsteen recently opened a show in Australia playing "Highway to Hell" by AC/DC. I find it hard to believe he took the time to pay a licensing fee to BMI or whomever to play that song since it was a cover. Is somebody going to sue "The Boss" now? I think not. Musicians constantly on a wim get up and jam various cover songs spur of the moment. Should members of Pearl Jam and Soundgarden be sued for millions for all of the time they played "Rockin' in the Free World" together when they showed up at each others gigs? And what about open mic nights? Record and publishing companies dug their own grave by allowing free music downloading after seeing the backlash Metallica took for standing up to it and now they go after the little guys in an attempt to recoup some money. Sad shit.
http://www.clevescene.com/scene-and...ver-band-caused-great-and-incalculable-damage
Why is this news? Every bar or other venue that has music played (either live or recorded) has to pay a small license fee which then covers them for any music played. This venue didn't have a music license so it's being sued ( NOT the cover band). The article wittering on about how many other cover bands perform these songs is irrelevant. It's the venue that has to be licensed not the performer. This is nothing new and applies equally, I believe, to jukeboxes as well as cover bands. FWIW Springsteen doesn't have to pay a licensing fee but the venue will have done so. This is how many musicians earn a living as you can get significant royalties if your album goes on a national chain of jukeboxes.