In most of Europe it's been random selection. Not mandatory for all. Either way, I don't agree with it. Forcing someone to do something they don't want to do when they have done nothing wrong goes against my very core beliefs.
Like paying taxes to support poor people
So paying for the "common good" isn't doing something. Gotcha.
Funny how your core beliefs can be adjusted as necessary. Insert church lady here.
So paying for the "common good" isn't doing something. Gotcha.
Funny how your core beliefs can be adjusted as necessary. Insert church lady here.
there have been taxes to support the common good of the country since its' inception
Sort of. The nature of which was quite different from the disaster we have now.
Sort of. The nature of which was quite different from the disaster we have now.
regardless, it's always been there. it took a drastic turn in the the early 20th century but we have no control over that
So doing service for the government isn't giving back to that same system?Come on dude. There an obvious different from taxes to physically forcing someone to do something.
I have no problem with taxes because it's only far to give back to a system that made it possible for you to receive in the first place. How much you give back is a completely other debate.
there have been taxes to support the common good of the country since its' inception
That has nothing to do with the argument. Technically there's been a policy of conscription in this country since its inception as well so the point is moot.
jesus fuck dudewe saw how well involuntary servitude worked in the slave days and then again in vietnam. between the two there has been serious friction, quite often violent, for almost the entire history of the country.
taxation has very much shaped the history of the country though. we were founded on it. it's extremely relevant to the conversation. still a sore subject to this day, obviously.
I'm dying to hear the logic behind this one.
I've read somethings that agree with that thought. They should go to voctech / trade schools instead so they learn an employable skill and not just earn a debt.
I work at an art college and see kids graduate 40K+ in debt with degrees in painting or sculpting that work as waiters between art shows.
jesus fuck dude
I'm not arguing for a draft, I'm saying that pointing out that taxes have existed since the beginning is utterly meaningless to the points I was making. It has nothing to do with my own views on either conscription or taxes but rather his claim that making people do something they don't want to do - and taxes qualify - being against his core beliefs is not true unless you conveniently qualify it with some exceptions. The actual justifications, rationale or details of those taxes are irrelevant because I'm challenging his beliefs, not the policy itself.
I could have brought up making kids go to school. There's an exception even though they're still people. Or I could have said making people immunize their kids, which some idiots argue against. The point is that his belief can't possibly be as black and white as he suggested it and since it's open to exceptions then he needs to present a more cogent argument against what others suggested besides "hell no it's wrong".
I read that they've added pop culture questions to the test. There was a ton of complains that there were reality TV show questions. I think it's BS that they were on there at all. What are your thoughts?