ehhh, its pretty easy to improve on actual Mexico.
New Mexico is like Refurbished Mexico. Same problems, shinier coat of paint.
New Mexico is like Refurbished Mexico. Same problems, shinier coat of paint.
There's a reason why I don't live in Wisconsin with the rest of my mother's family.Relevant:
I'd rather live in New Mexico than the stinky swamp that is NoVA.ehhh, its pretty easy to improve on actual Mexico.
New Mexico is like Refurbished Mexico. Same problems, shinier coat of paint.
I love the idea of an offgrid compound, I just wouldn't put it in Wisconsin.Today in "a fool and his/her money": found out my aunt has taken the inheritance left to her by my grandmother and is building a compound with walls, security cameras, and generators up in Northern Wisconsin for what she views as the inevitable fall of the United States because of Joe Biden's "illegitimate installation" as president.
Also found out that my cousin (her son) and his wife are going to be fired because they're refusing vaccinations.
Oh, and my mother expects me to have sympathy because "mandates are unAmerican".
I'm just another in a long line of dipshits, it seems.
867-5309I love the idea of an offgrid compound, I just wouldn't put it in Wisconsin.
She obviously hasn't done her prepper/survivalist homework. Missouri, northern Arkansas, and the "great American redoubt" are all better places for self-sustaining agriculture, staying away from democrats, or both.
Also what's her number?
867-5309
Her "agriculture" is a shitload (pun firmly intended) of those 5 gallon buckets full of rations they sell during day-time Fox News.
Which is exactly why I live exactly where any nuclear exchange is a guarantee of death.As an "exercise in freedom" she should shut off all the utilities to the house and live on nothing other than what's in those buckets for say, one month.
She might come around yet. Staying alive, and thriving, or even enjoying an occasional bit of comfort ain't the same thing.
ehhh, of all the targets, i wouldnt hit you first if i was russia. Second, sure.Which is exactly why I live exactly where any nuclear exchange is a guarantee of death.
Your first strike wouldn't be both command and stockpile?ehhh, of all the targets, i wouldnt hit you first if i was russia. Second, sure.
No, itd be launch.Your first strike wouldn't be both command and stockpile?
You've got an interesting strategy.
Oh, and my mother expects me to have sympathy because "mandates are unAmerican".
Eh, that's just one leg of the triad, dude.No, itd be launch.
Command has fallback, siloes don't.
ehhh, russia seems to have done an amazing job at scenario 2 in a scant 8 years.We have multiple launch capabilities with multiple missiles carrying multiple warheads from multiple platforms. Can't stop them all.
Seems to me the better strategy would be to at least first target anyway political centers, satellites, and key nodes of petrochem, communications, and financial rather than the missile sites themselves. In other words everything we need to function above an early 19th century level.
Hitting a missile site after the missiles launched isn't a primary target.
I remember reading a thing about what it would take to bring down the United States and one thing that was a top priority in all the scenarios was destroying Houston (and general area) as there is so much petrochem centered there and we can't function without it.
Of course the other effective scenario was to bring it down from within, politically and culturally rather than militarily. Takes patience though. Like generational level patience.
I don't have the knowledge to know what's all involved in cyber-war but I do have an imagination and can see how it could screw up just about everything and it does seem to be the preferred method going forward, at least between modern technologically advanced nation states.ehhh, russia seems to have done an amazing job at scenario 2 in a scant 8 years.