you know what? i completely agree with you. it's not that women are incapable of handing such a position, it's that it's impossible to give such a demanding job and demanding family 100%. i would bet a billion on that. it's impossible to completely dedicate yourself to be the best ceo, for example, and best mother. you can't do it. and this is a whole nother argument, i believe. this is exactly the reason i'm a stay-at-home mom. because i'm that good and that smart enough to be a ceo in a company. because i would never stop at mediocre because that's not how i am. i would challenge myself to the top. which is why i'm not working, and dedicating myself to being a good mother. you can't do both 100%, and no job is more important than raising children productively in my book. so i chose.
so pick one. choose to be the big-time ceo. i'll support you. but don't try to do that and have two kids that you never see and pay someone else to raise them just to say you did it. you didn't.
if you want to be a mother, work somewhere that's not too high-demanding and that gives you money so you can dedicate yourself to your family for awhile. you can be a ceo before or after the children if you really want both. you can't fucking have it at the same time. IT'S NOT FAIR, BUT THAT'S THE WAY IT IS. PICK ONE.
(this is in no way directed to pandora or anyone on here. now i'm on my soapbox and i'm talking to those bitches who's heads are so bloated and fucked up with the false cockiness that they can have it all and do it all. THAT'S being a selfish bitch.
)