Not enough of the moderate or liberal ones.
no different than the tea party douchebags
I might possibly be supportive, if I thought they cared at all about justice and not just about sticking it to religion. As it is, they're just confirming my perception that they're both tools who rank higher on the arrogant-douchebag scale than most religious folk.
no different than the tea party douchebags
I might possibly be supportive, if I thought they cared at all about justice and not just about sticking it to religion. As it is, they're just confirming my perception that they're both tools who rank higher on the arrogant-douchebag scale than most religious folk.
Still you..
You some how think that the Church of England is a Catholic Church.
The only way you can apply that logic is basically also saying that all Christians are a Jewish faith.
You were also using the wrong sect of Christianity. The Church of England had nothing to do with the reformation. The whole reason for the split was because the Pope didn't grant the King a divorce from his wife. This had nothing to do with Martin Luther. So no they aren't even a reformed Catholic Church as you put it.
Not possible to be more arrogant than most religious folk.
No it won't. He just proved he knew nothing about the very thing he hates, so I'm done with it.
Yes they are.. Go read something..
I dunno about that. There are some atheist protesters in Texas that that make religious zealots look like lambs.
Pat Robertson
an extremely vocal minority
Moderate Christians SHOULDN'T be a vocal minority, is what I am getting at.
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/faith/2010/03/atheist_bible_porn_smut.html
They both resort to some pretty bullshit tactics.
Most moderates just want to do their thing, live their life, and worship how they choose.
That's a bullshit tactic? I actually liked it. I mean, it's not like they were going to create a massive bible bonfire. They donated the bibles to libraries.
And if they were all like this, I wouldn't have a problem with religion.