itburnswhenipee said:You sure about that?
also (just for fun):
[MG]http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y16/itburnswhenipee/20020712l.gif[/IMG]
Oh, I'm quite sure.itburnswhenipee said:You sure about that?
also (just for fun):
It was originally Motorola, then a joint effort between M/IBM/Apple, now I'm not sure how involved Motorola is in the Power 5 series of chips.SpangeMonkee said:I thought Motorolla made the Apple chips?
b_sinning said:It means no more fanless Macs unless they want them to catch fire.
CletusJones said:how did i miss this thread the first time? It must have been the shitty title.
gimmie a break, i've only got 5 braincells.smileynev said:dumbass. Yer just a dumbass
Great, a shitty OS on a shitty CPUsmileynev said:http://www.macrumorslive.com/web/
Its been confirmed. They are moving at least some of their systems to intel. All hail the iBook with a celeron m in it...
ChikkenNoodul said:Great, a shitty OS on a shitty CPU
I fucking hate Intel's new mobile chips They're screwing me out of good gaming.
Sucks, sucks, sucks.smileynev said:how? The Pentium M is a great processor.
ChikkenNoodul said:Sucks, sucks, sucks.
Might be great for people who want long battery life, but that's what extra batteries are for.
Sure clock speed vs. clock speed it's better in many situations, but not all.smileynev said:Its per cycle performance far exceeds anything on the desktop side, at least from what I understand.
I am curious as to whether this will increase or decrease the value of powerpc based macs.
ChikkenNoodul said:Sure clock speed vs. clock speed it's better in many situations, but not all.
I'm just pissed because I've got a P4 2.4 and I'm being forced to get a 1.6 Pentium M
I think the only benefit I'll see is that it runs a bit cooler
From all of the benchmarks I've seen, it's about equal.smileynev said:That should be a lot faster then your old P4.