The difference is going to be arguably academic, and I'd like to see what type of testing they did to determine this.
This is the same apologetic nonsense as "standardized tests are bad because even though all children learn differently they are still beautiful and special geniuses"
Exactly. The teaching is what makes the difference.
I don't know about all that fluffy bunny bullshit, but I do believe standardize academics are not good for all. Some children need to learn differently than others. But then, how can you account for everyone? You can't. So they do whatever they can.