"This country" is what we the people have made it. So technically it isn't backwards at all. It's forwards. And also side-to-side.
And perhaps perpendicular.
If they aren't having the married couples show documents... why don't you just change your W4 and claim you are married?
Nah, that's just means you the people are also backwards..
Nah, that's just means you the people are also backwards..
says you. you don't think americans look at the avg mullet wearing australian and don't immediately jump to the conclusion that the guy is an idiot? same dif
Over 300 million people from every country on earth. I would call our legislation "representative" of the status quo. Most people just don't want gays to marry. Some day that may change, but for now it's what they want. *shrug*
The America Australian Mullet Ratio is around 74:1..
considering how much more populous our country is, australia clearly loses this
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=australian+mullet&word2=american+mullet
The America Australian Mullet Ratio is around 74:1..
we have more F150s on the road than the population of australia, come on
Are you implying that America is well representing the majority of beliefs worldwide?
Per Capita would still show more mullets in the US..
Is gay marriage widely embraced worldwide?
Are Marlboros?
can you claim him as a dependent?So I just got an email from the company that is conducting my relocation and they will not give compensation for "domestic partners". They will, however, to spouses and dependants, no problem. Don't even have to show a marriage license or birth certificate for either of them.
The issue is chim and I can't get married in Ohio. It won't be recognized. Therefore by definition we are not spouses. We would be "domestic partners". Sure we could get a marriage license in another state or country, but it still won't qualify as Ohio strictly enforces any binding between two people that is not a certified marriage is unrecognizable in the law.
What makes this more interesting, however, is that my company is global. We have facilities where gay marriage is legal. Hell the NA HR department is in Conn, in which gay marriage is legal. Technically in that state, chim and I can be spouses and we would be covered. Because it is Ohio, however, we cannot.
Yes I know it will be the same story from the Lone Star state, but it is still discrimination any way to slice it.
yes, but the question that's more pertinent is would db and chim be married if it were legal for them to do so? if they would be, then they would be spouses for the purposes of this transfer.But, say, I was just living with someone, a girl, whom I was not married to, and I was going through the same ordeal, would this not mean I would have the same issue?