Lookup info on the Verizon Building and the US Post Office on Church St. Post office not damaged at all, Verizon had bunch of damage but was masonry building.Again you add a piece of absolutely useless information to the discussion.
Lookup info on the Verizon Building and the US Post Office on Church St. Post office not damaged at all, Verizon had bunch of damage but was masonry building.Again you add a piece of absolutely useless information to the discussion.
Lookup info on the Verizon Building and the US Post Office on Church St. Post office not damaged at all, Verizon had bunch of damage but was masonry building.
If it's a conspiracy, why blow up building 7 ? What does that gain?
Do you have any evidence to back that up? From what research I have conducted, it doesn't seem like WTC7 was that badly damages at all from the collapse of WTC 1 & 2. Look here at WTC7 after the collapse of WTC 1 & 2.
http://i.imgur.com/1Yt9R.jpg
iirc, there was also an underground fire that spread to WTC7.
Building 7 was the third twin.
It was awfully heartbroken by the loss of his brothers.
No water was ever used on the fires from floor 7-13. There is also an analysis if explosives were used on page 27. Page 53 has explination of what probably happened.The videos with the engineers talking about how you can see the implosion are very interesting, because you can. It wasn't a floor by floor collapse like the WTC towers, nor did it topple. It imploded and went straight down in 7 seconds. It was perfect.
Let me ask. What good is the structural engineering reports going to do? You saw the collapse on TV. You know both towers came straight down.
I personally highly doubt the structural engineering report will give you any worthwhile information on why the collapse of WTC1 & WTC2 did not damage WTC6, yet damaged WTC7 to the point of it collapsing.
There are always ALWAYS conspiracies over events like this. No wonder the national Enquirer is so popular.
“Why isn't there more video? Without telling too much of what I know of Pentagon security, you would be surprised how few cameras
there are outside the building. Humans actively patrol-ling a building's perimeter are a tad more effective than doz-ens of monitors which may or may not be watched at any given moment. Given the limited number of entrances to the facility (all highly controlled areas), cameras are generally only needed in high traffic areas like vehicle control points (such as the one this video came from).”
im sorry i have seen the pentagon from the interstate AFTER the attacks and there is no fucking way in hell a plane hit that shit