That's a silly argument and you know it. They have countless interactions where no one wants to shoot them dude. The risk of getting shot goes up exponentially in the scenario that we're actually talking about.this is all predicated off the assumption that every citizen has the desire and goal to shoot a cop. This is statistically and patently a false concept.
If its a silly argument, why are you using it to justify irrational escalation of force?That's a silly argument and you know it. They have countless interactions where no one wants to shoot them dude. The risk of getting shot goes up exponentially in the scenario that we're actually talking about.
he said this? Where?If its a silly argument, why are you using it to justify irrational escalation of force?
"There is acceptance of that every day. Every traffic stop, yada yada yada"he said this? Where?
"every citizen has the desire and goal to shoot a cop"
No one has said anything about anyone desiring a shooting. If you don't understand what I was saying then ask, but don't put words in my mouth.Totally different. "Accepting" you might get in a car accident every day is entirely different than "desiring" it.
let's review:No one has said anything about anyone desiring a shooting. If you don't understand what I was saying then ask, but don't put words in my mouth.
this is all predicated off the assumption that every citizen has the desire and goal to shoot a cop. This is statistically and patently a false concept.
That's a silly argument and you know it.
Me:where did he use it to justify irrational escalation?If its a silly argument, why are you using it to justify irrational escalation of force?
"There is acceptance of that every day. Every traffic stop, yada yada yada"
Quoted above.
If you're accepting it could happen at any traffic stop you're gearing up for it at every stop, if only subconsciously.
Totally different. "Accepting" you might get in a car accident every day is entirely different than "desiring" it.