From my own googling:
http://voices.yahoo.com/nutritional-benefits-feeding-dog-raw-chicken-10824013.html
http://skeptvet.com/Blog/2012/07/new-study-on-raw-diets-for-dogs-adds-little-to-ongoing-debate/
http://rawfed.com/myths/research.html
I'll get back to you on anything other people bring to my attention Zac.
Studies done decades ago cite diets high in protein as the cause of kidney failure in dogs. It is true the low quality protein can cause kidney damage. Low quality protein generates large amounts of waste when it is processed by the liver. This leaves the kidneys to clean up, leading to severe kidney problems. High quality protein, such as real, raw chicken, does not generate high amounts of waste, putting much less stress on the kidneys. According to About.com, six chicken wings have up to 34 grams of protein; a 6oz piece of breast meat can have almost 40. Amino acids, which make up proteins, are important building blocks for your dog's body. So a diet high in good quality protein helps your dog lead a healthier life.
Chicken fat contains vitamins A, D, and E. Vitamin A helps with vision and coat health, vitamin D works with calcium and phosphorus to promote strong bones and teeth, and vitamin E acts as an antioxidant, which is essential for proper reproduction and is one factor in preventing cancer.
Not only does chicken contain good protein and many essential vitamins and minerals, the act of eating chicken helps keep teeth clean. The chewing of chicken bones will also develop the muscles in the face, jaw, and neck.
http://voices.yahoo.com/nutritional-benefits-feeding-dog-raw-chicken-10824013.html
So overall, this study shows that raw diets are highly digestible (which is not surprising, but of questionable importance), that short-term feeding of them under controlled circumstances doesn’t seem to have any negative effects or any benefits unless one considers less poop an important benefit or buys into the still unproven health benefits of prebiotics. There is nothing wrong with studying the variables this project looked at, of course, but it doesn’t have much direct bearing on the controversy over feeding dogs and cats raw diets.
http://skeptvet.com/Blog/2012/07/new-study-on-raw-diets-for-dogs-adds-little-to-ongoing-debate/
ut one must realize that there is NO evidence whatsoever to prove that kibbled, processed foods are good for your pets. The only research that has been done into processed foods was performed to see a) if dogs could be fed a grain-based food, b) if dogs could survive acceptably on these processed foods for a short period of time, c) if X brand of food can do such-and-such for the dog (help with kidney disease, help with diabetes, help with obesity), and d) if X brand of food is "better" (more palatable, better liked, less total stool volume, etc.) than Y brand of food. No research has been done to determine the long-term effects of feeding kibble, nor to determine if it is actually healthy for your dog (it is just assumed healthy because it has passed a 6 month feeding trial, and then manufacturers falsely advertise their product as healthy.).
But as for raw diets: one million years of evolution apparently is not enough evidence for those citing lack of research and lack of studies in scientific literature.
http://rawfed.com/myths/research.html
I'll get back to you on anything other people bring to my attention Zac.