I have never mentioned maniacal research. What are you on about?
Oh Jesus.
Again I'll ask, where is this dubious research you keep talking about?
Are you joking? He has constantly mentioned that the only research into processed pet food is paid for by those same companies, so in his opinion that automatically makes it null and void.He never mentioned research so why do you keep asking?
Where's the research into pet food and how did you pick your own brand?
That's just silly, your daughter has mentioned in the past that there are decent kibbles out there that do not use starches as their main ingredient. Yes if you buy crappy kibble you'll get grain and corn and such, so don't buy crappy kibble.I think you'll find that most kibble has substantial quantities of grain so hardly how you describe it.
http://www.canadasguidetodogs.com/health/nutritionarticle2.htm
Nature's Recipe Lamb & Rice kibble. What are you envisioning? Dried meat and rice? Well the main ingredient is ground whole wheat. Not, I'm sure what you expect with that name.
God damn mod bot
Are you joking? He has constantly mentioned that the only research into processed pet food is paid for by those same companies, so in his opinion that automatically makes it null and void.
Which is just ridiculous, you get the research, you go through it, you check the findings, you check and see who the researchers are and what they have written in the past. It's the same as researching medical papers.
And since fly opened this back up:
That's just silly, your daughter has mentioned in the past that there are decent kibbles out there that do not use starches as their main ingredient. Yes if you buy crappy kibble you'll get grain and corn and such, so don't buy crappy kibble.
Are you joking? He has constantly mentioned that the only research into processed pet food is paid for by those same companies, so in his opinion that automatically makes it null and void.
Which is just ridiculous, you get the research, you go through it, you check the findings, you check and see who the researchers are and what they have written in the past. It's the same as researching medical papers.
Again I'll ask, where is this dubious research you keep talking about?
Why do you keep asking me about my choices of dog food? I'm not arguing whether or not mine is better than yours. I'm arguing that you have no scientific basis for saying that raw feed is better.Did that with your food choice did you?
No, I didn't look at the list. And you were talking to gee there, not Domon.
What is silly is sidestepping his argument of "start with quality ingredients and end with a quality food" for the replacement of "most kibble sucks"
Yes, most kibble probably does suck, what about his argument about starting with quality ingredients?
Why do you keep asking me about my choices of dog food? I'm not arguing whether or not mine is better than yours. I'm arguing that you have no scientific basis for saying that raw feed is better.
I never said that kibble was better
I never said raw was better
I said that you have no scientific basis for saying that raw is better.
Stop bringing up distractions, it's a weak attempt to derail the discussion.
Also, what the hell is with the deflection towards modbot and the people voting the thread closed?
I happen to think that article threads shouldn't get voted down. It's pretty disrespectful towards the effort someone made to post an article.