Deflection is a sign of unwillingness to admit what's actually there. The ball moved due to the ground. It was an incomplete pass. If you watch seconds 31-34 at 720p and full screen, you can clearly see it.
The ref was right. Michigan didn't get robbed there. Now the passing interference call that supposedly happened after that, I've only seen a picture of it, but the Hawkeye defender WAS draped all over the Michigan receiver.
Well you obviously can't "clearly" see it, because the call wasn't confirmed. I don't see it at all.
Wasnt confirmed? I didnt realize they overturned the call on the field. What are we arguing about then? They called it a TD.
You do know the difference between a call standing and it being confirmed, correct?
"Touched: The Jerry Sandusky Story" is now avaialable on Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/Touched-Jerry-Sandusky-Story-Limited/dp/1582612935/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0
You do know the difference between a call standing and it being confirmed, correct?
Give it up man you lost. If you guys were a good team you wouldn't have had to worry about a single play. Most real teams are up by 40 by that point.
Yes. I also know the similarity between them is there was nothing on video evidence that supports you stating they were robbed.
Lots of games come down to a single play you jerk.
OK, cause it sure didn't seem like you knew the difference. And I disagree with your interpretation, as did the announcers.
wow. sandusky might have been pimping kids to rich donors. story from 7 months ago on it.
http://phillysportsdaily.com/college/2011/11/10/allegation-sandusky-pimped-out-kids/
And the refs agreed with mine. Which one do you think means more?