if that were true then people wouldn't download.Reread what I said. Own OR rent. If its not worth spending money on, its therefore worthless to you and not worth the time to deal with.
if that were true then people wouldn't download.Reread what I said. Own OR rent. If its not worth spending money on, its therefore worthless to you and not worth the time to deal with.
if that were true then people wouldn't download.
If you wouldn't pay to own or rent it, then its obviously not worth watching.
torrent won't start stupid school network is always gaying up my torrents.
YGPM
Next on my list, Windows Home Server.
if that were true then people wouldn't download.
No, people do it because they don't think they'll get caught or be any consequences.People download because it is convenient and free; whether the material is worth buying or renting is beside the point.
Once again, wrong. You have a situation where the downloader wants something and thinks they can get it for free without consequence. Its obviously worth something to them or else they wouldn't download it in the first place.what you have is a situation where the downloader feels that it is worth their time and effort to view something, the renter feels it is worth their money to view something, and the buyer feels it is worth more of their money to own something.
No, its not. Not at all. When you watch something on TV or even DVR it, we can record it as a viewer for the program. This is huge when selling ads. If you torrent shit, your "vote" for the program doesn't get counted. A little bird told me that this is the exact problem with Fox and sci-fi. Their shows get ripped off so much, that it doesn't bring in the Nielson numbers to show to the advertisers, and the money dries up quickly. Next time your favorite show gets canceled or you bitch about there being too many retarded reality TV shows on, think about it.i pay for cable but dont want to get a dvr so i just get it off the internet to watch instead. same basic thing.
You're so cool because you steal.well i happen to not care, even if i were a millionaire its likely i still wouldn't pay for shit. now yes there are a few rare things that i feel compelled to buy for my collection. and in the case for books i demand hard copy because e-books are such a god awful experience.
but on that subject.... i can't honestly recall the last dvd or video game i actually paid for.
Poor babytorrent won't start stupid school network is always gaying up my torrents.
but i went with the 1080 instead just cause of this screenshot.
couldn't the networks make the programs available for download with embedded non-skippable ads so they can get proper metrics for ad revenue rather then keep their collective heads in a hole like an ostrich and pretend the whole thing isn't happening?No, its not. Not at all. When you watch something on TV or even DVR it, we can record it as a viewer for the program. This is huge when selling ads. If you torrent shit, your "vote" for the program doesn't get counted. A little bird told me that this is the exact problem with Fox and sci-fi. Their shows get ripped off so much, that it doesn't bring in the Nielson numbers to show to the advertisers, and the money dries up quickly. Next time your favorite show gets canceled or you bitch about there being too many retarded reality TV shows on, think about it.
couldn't the networks make the programs available for download with embedded non-skippable ads so they can get proper metrics for ad revenue rather then keep their collective heads in a hole like an ostrich and pretend the whole thing isn't happening?
couldn't the networks make the programs available for download with embedded non-skippable ads so they can get proper metrics for ad revenue rather then keep their collective heads in a hole like an ostrich and pretend the whole thing isn't happening?
couldn't the networks make the programs available for download with embedded non-skippable ads so they can get proper metrics for ad revenue rather then keep their collective heads in a hole like an ostrich and pretend the whole thing isn't happening?
Their shows get ripped off so much, that it doesn't bring in the Nielson numbers to show to the advertisers, and the money dries up quickly.
Nielson is far more advanced than you realize. We don't need special boxes in people's houses anymore to know what you're watching. I know I've told people here offline some of the projects in this vein that I'm working on and most think it somewhere between sci-fi and fucking creepy. There's other methods for determining viewership than Nielson, its just what I mention because everyone here knows what that is.That's the core of the problem. Relying on Nielsen's ancient methods these days is about as backasswards retarded as the method the music business used before SoundScan.