I'm not arguing that if someone is unhappy with their partner's libido they don't have recourse, but you bring up how often she may or may not have consented to sex, which is 100% hypothetical/conjecture on your part btw, as if that has any bearing on the events that transpired.
Food TV shows that you may not be watching but should be
- Thread starter water
- Start date
Valve1138
I like the AB in the GB
Wow, so someone here thinks rape is ok.
Another piece of the toxic puzzle.
Another piece of the toxic puzzle.
Ha! I win the bet. I knew Valve would be the first little shit to try and twist it to start trouble. And I even called Asa being the first to gravy it!
Mr. Argumentor
I fab shitboxes and shitbox accessories.
Mr. Argumentor
I fab shitboxes and shitbox accessories.
If you want to respond in kind, maybe you should tell a woman who went through that shit that she should have sucked it up and had sex with an abusive husband because that's what she agreed to and ignore the fact that the husband agreed to not be an abusive dick.
Cause that's the toxic shit that nukes is doing, literally right here in this thread.
Fuck's sake.
Cause that's the toxic shit that nukes is doing, literally right here in this thread.
Fuck's sake.
what is he twisting, though?Ha! I win the bet. I knew Valve would be the first little shit to try and twist it to start trouble. And I even called Asa being the first to gravy it!
He's trying to get Nukes back in the thread to argue. No good can come of it. You were doing fine making your point. The conversation didn't need a spiteful little shit adding to it.
he also hasn't watched the documentary, which if he had he'd know she did tall about consensual sex they did have, although if you look at the timeline he started beating and raping her pretty early into the marriage, and what she called "consensual" sex hardly seemed consensual when her choice was between "consenting" or being beaten & raped.
if he'd watched, he'd also know that John bragged to his friends about how much he loved to make women scream, cry, & struggle, so for him rape was the point.
idk I'm always glad to see men who are willing to say shut down rape apologists.
and with such a low bar, you'd think I wouldn't be perpetually disappointed, but you'd be wrong.
Bobbitt should be in jail for what he did to his wife. And I'm not aware of any sexual quota married or not. But I knew the pigeons would be out pecking. They don't care about the topic, they care about ripping on Nukes. Some days he makes it easy. I was just saying I knew who was going to throw the first shitball.
So am I. No excuse married or not. Domestic violence is a horrible reality.
It's touched more people than most can imagine.
so can they ever rip on him? when is the right time? what's the appropriate topic?
the documentary covers his trial, for his abuse of her, but the scope of it was limited to just one singular incidence of rape (the night of The Incident™) and evidence of the pattern of rape and abuse was not allowed to be discussed/testified to. they couldn't submit the dozens of DV calls police had responded to for him hurting her, the hospital visits/pictures with bruises and busted lips. due to the very limited scope, he got away with it. it wasn't until her trial where the pattern of abuse & evidence to that end was allowed to be shared.
but you apparently always think it's wrong.
Valve1138
I like the AB in the GB
The cabbie will be on one of these Netflix documentaries one day. No doubt. It’ll likely be called Catfished Cabbies - Insurance Fruad.
/tv topic
/tv topic
Mr. Argumentor
I fab shitboxes and shitbox accessories.