This is stupid as people will have moral objections to using animals for research. So this statistic is autistic.
Statistics can be manipulated to achieve any result you want.
67% of people know this.
This is stupid as people will have moral objections to using animals for research. So this statistic is autistic.
I think you're missing the point.This is stupid as people will have moral objections to using animals for research. So this statistic is autistic.
The bearing shop in Dartmouth is a FAG distributor, and I figured I'd walk out of there with a FAG for my angle grinder, but apparently FAG doesn't make 628 bearings.I'm a big KYK bearing fan.
Though I sometimes go out of my way to look for FAG bearings.
I think you're missing the point.
They make a 627 and a 629, not a 628.Do they only make up to 627?
That's odd...They make a 627 and a 629, not a 628.
So no FAGs for me
Did you check for KYKs?They make a 627 and a 629, not a 628.
So no FAGs for me
No KYKs here. Had a choice of FAG (didn't make one), SKF (only had metal ended ones in stock) and RBI (had rubber ended ones).Did you check for KYKs?
I agree. Science is geared towards "Can we" instead of "Should we". This is the only "statistic" that violates the boundary between those two ideas.Nah just single out that one statistic because it's dumb. Not arguing against the point you were making.
Verbal diarrhea at its finest.What is so great about discovery? It is a violent, penetrative act that scars what it explores. What you call discovery, I call the rape of the natural world.
[GIPHY="silly trolling"]https://media1.giphy.com/media/fgpbeISHTP3Fe/giphy.gif[/GIPHY]What is so great about discovery? It is a violent, penetrative act that scars what it explores. What you call discovery, I call the rape of the natural world.
Verbal diarrhea at its finest.
What is so great about discovery? It is a violent, penetrative act that scars what it explores. What you call discovery, I call the rape of the natural world.
Verbal diarrhea at its finest.