WTF UCSB shooting guy posted a creepy manifesto on YouTube. It's since been pulled...

or maybe he doesn't know what he's talking about. indecent exposure is not going to be considered sexual assault because a woman just happened to be walking by, jesus fucking Christ

there are a lot of cops who don't know the fucking laws they're supposed to be enforcing

oh, so a law enforcement officer, who also has to attend court hearings and witness judgments, doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to charges filed and the law.

got it.

I should trust the guy on the internet instead. perhaps you're right, but I'm not about to pour through Wisconsin legal docs online to try and prove you're right or wrong.
 
or maybe he doesn't know what he's talking about. indecent exposure is not going to be considered sexual assault because a woman just happened to be walking by, jesus fucking Christ

there are a lot of cops who don't know the fucking laws they're supposed to be enforcing

That's tantamount to saying "My cousin's brothers wife's best friend told me..."

Dont even bother.
 
oh, so a law enforcement officer, who also has to attend court hearings and witness judgments, doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to charges filed and the law.

got it.

I should trust the guy on the internet instead. perhaps you're right, but I'm not about to pour through Wisconsin legal docs online to try and prove you're right or wrong.
Fucking lol, "some guy told me"

kay

§ 22.011. SEXUAL ASSAULT. (a) A person commits an
offense if the person:
(1) intentionally or knowingly:
(A) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual
organ of another person by any means, without that person's
consent;
(B) causes the penetration of the mouth of
another person by the sexual organ of the actor, without that
person's consent; or
(C) causes the sexual organ of another person,
without that person's consent, to contact or penetrate the mouth,
anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor; or
(2) intentionally or knowingly:
(A) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual
organ of a child by any means;
(B) causes the penetration of the mouth of a
child by the sexual organ of the actor;
(C) causes the sexual organ of a child to contact
or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person,
including the actor;
(D) causes the anus of a child to contact the
mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the
actor; or
(E) causes the mouth of a child to contact the
anus or sexual organ of another person, including the actor.
(b) A sexual assault under Subsection (a)(1) is without the
consent of the other person if:
(1) the actor compels the other person to submit or
participate by the use of physical force or violence;
(2) the actor compels the other person to submit or
participate by threatening to use force or violence against the
other person, and the other person believes that the actor has the
present ability to execute the threat;
(3) the other person has not consented and the actor
knows the other person is unconscious or physically unable to
resist;
(4) the actor knows that as a result of mental disease
or defect the other person is at the time of the sexual assault
incapable either of appraising the nature of the act or of resisting
it;
(5) the other person has not consented and the actor
knows the other person is unaware that the sexual assault is
occurring;
(6) the actor has intentionally impaired the other
person's power to appraise or control the other person's conduct by
administering any substance without the other person's knowledge;
(7) the actor compels the other person to submit or
participate by threatening to use force or violence against any
person, and the other person believes that the actor has the ability
to execute the threat;
(8) the actor is a public servant who coerces the other
person to submit or participate;
(9) the actor is a mental health services provider or a
health care services provider who causes the other person, who is a
patient or former patient of the actor, to submit or participate by
exploiting the other person's emotional dependency on the actor;
(10) the actor is a clergyman who causes the other
person to submit or participate by exploiting the other person's
emotional dependency on the clergyman in the clergyman's
professional character as spiritual adviser; or
(11) the actor is an employee of a facility where the
other person is a resident, unless the employee and resident are
formally or informally married to each other under Chapter 2,
Family Code.
(c) In this section:
(1) "Child" means a person younger than 17 years of age
who is not the spouse of the actor.
(2) "Spouse" means a person who is legally married to
another.
(3) "Health care services provider" means:
(A) a physician licensed under Subtitle B, Title
3, Occupations Code;
(B) a chiropractor licensed under Chapter 201,
Occupations Code;
(C) a physical therapist licensed under Chapter
453, Occupations Code;
(D) a physician assistant licensed under Chapter
204, Occupations Code; or
(E) a registered nurse, a vocational nurse, or an
advanced practice nurse licensed under Chapter 301, Occupations
Code.
(4) "Mental health services provider" means an
individual, licensed or unlicensed, who performs or purports to
perform mental health services, including a:
(A) licensed social worker as defined by Section
505.002, Occupations Code;
(B) chemical dependency counselor as defined by
Section 504.001, Occupations Code;
(C) licensed professional counselor as defined
by Section 503.002, Occupations Code;
(D) licensed marriage and family therapist as
defined by Section 502.002, Occupations Code;
(E) member of the clergy;
(F) psychologist offering psychological services
as defined by Section 501.003, Occupations Code; or
(G) special officer for mental health assignment
certified under Section 1701.404, Occupations Code.
(5) "Employee of a facility" means a person who is an
employee of a facility defined by Section 250.001, Health and
Safety Code, or any other person who provides services for a
facility for compensation, including a contract laborer.
(d) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(2)
that the conduct consisted of medical care for the child and did not
include any contact between the anus or sexual organ of the child
and the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of the actor or a third party.
(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under
Subsection (a)(2) that:
(1) the actor was not more than three years older than
the victim and at the time of the offense:
(A) was not required under Chapter 62, Code of
Criminal Procedure, to register for life as a sex offender; or
(B) was not a person who under Chapter 62, Code of
Criminal Procedure, had a reportable conviction or adjudication for
an offense under this section; and
(2) the victim:
(A) was a child of 14 years of age or older; and
(B) was not a person whom the actor was
prohibited from marrying or purporting to marry or with whom the
actor was prohibited from living under the appearance of being
married under Section 25.01.
(f) An offense under this section is a felony of the second
degree, except that an offense under this section is a felony of the
first degree if the victim was a person whom the actor was
prohibited from marrying or purporting to marry or with whom the
actor was prohibited from living under the appearance of being
married under Section 25.01.

Texas Penal Code
 
Last edited:
oh, so a law enforcement officer, who also has to attend court hearings and witness judgments, doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to charges filed and the law.

got it.

I should trust the guy on the internet instead. perhaps you're right, but I'm not about to pour through Wisconsin legal docs online to try and prove you're right or wrong.

yup, plenty of cops don't know the laws. they're called into court to testify on their cases, not as legal experts

but yeah, if you're claiming that people have been charged with sexual assault simply for peeing in public then I'll put money on one of three reasons:

1. he's wrong

2. he bullshit you

3. you misunderstood and chose to stick to this mistaken idea because it confirms your beliefs
 
is this a bad attempt at humor?

I was pointing out that I answered your goddamn question. I chose a random picture of America to show that she lives in America and that kind of shit happens in America. just because you don't experience it since you're not a woman doesn't mean it doesn't happen
 
He was equating the fact it's not rampant as a reason why it isn't a problem.

Dont be obtuse.

no, dumbass......I was SIMPLY stating that it's not nearly as big of a problem as some are making it out to be....you decided to try and spin it. let me quote it again for your feeble argument:

"It's not a rampant problem anymore than any number of other mentally handicapped minority problems."
 
I was pointing out that I answered your goddamn question. I chose a random picture of America to show that she lives in America and that kind of shit happens in America. just because you don't experience it since you're not a woman doesn't mean it doesn't happen

you posted a picture, of America, with certain areas marked...... if your intent was to simply show a map of the entire country, you failed....just as you've failed in this discussion.
 
some guy, my father in law, a sheriff

you....some argumentative twat on the internet

:lol:
Please, do link an article where someone was convicted of "sexual assault" for public urination.

Also Sheriff of what county, what state, marriage license to prove relationship.

I can pull up penal codes for 50 states and 100~ish years of case law that is public record. No one is asking you to do anything less.