Halp Tardwheel Political Circle Jerkoff 2017

Tardwheel


  • Total voters
    10
Status
Not open for further replies.
People who resisted Hitler and his Wehrmacht where called "terrorists".

5bb4Si4.gif
 
"like free, but not" comes across as creating this dichotomy where there's free, or expensive. if @APRIL and @fly are able to travel much more cheaply than the average traveler, using the fact that they travel to imply they don't have to struggle with money/budget is disingenuous.
What the.?

I'm using the fact that they travel to imply they are better off than I am.
 
What the.?

I'm using the fact that they travel to imply they are better off than I am.
you said "practically free, like free but not" to point out that practically free is not actually free. while that is obviously true, there is an infinite amount of $ that constitutes not actually free. I'm sure they spend more than $5, but $5 is not free and if that's what they spent, one could hardly use that $5 spent to prove they're wealthy

dude I get financial struggles. I'm just saying, if they have a way to do it that is inexpensive for them, it doesn't mean they don't also struggle to "stay afloat," which is what you were originally using their travel to disprove
 
more wealth than you doesn't mean lots of wealth or not struggling, it may just mean they struggle less, or that they have access to opportunities you don't with regards to travel
I know this. It doesn't change the fact that I can't travel.
 
you said "practically free, like free but not" to point out that practically free is not actually free. while that is obviously true, there is an infinite amount of $ that constitutes not actually free. I'm sure they spend more than $5, but $5 is not free and if that's what they spent, one could hardly use that $5 spent to prove they're wealthy

dude I get financial struggles. I'm just saying, if they have a way to do it that is inexpensive for them, it doesn't mean they don't also struggle to "stay afloat," which is what you were originally using their travel to disprove
Their opportunities to travel count. If they can do the things I want to do regardless of financial position, then they are, in my view, doing better than me.
 
here is what kim dot com has to say about seth rich

I KNOW THAT SETH RICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK. I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.

Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.

I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.

“He wanted to change that from the inside.” I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.

The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable.

I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.

http://kim.com/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.