ಠ_ಠ
What? That's what I'd do to refocus the topic. Now they can always just say "But Rush said!"
Do you even remember what the bill was about? It would exempt a narrow class of employers from providing a narrow class of health coverage. It's pretty goddamn mind boggling to imagine how revising something that hasn't even went into effect yet limits choice. Last time I checked Fluke (the chick) enrolled in a Catholic university, of her own free will, knowing the consequences. That's a choice.
She also said "Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school." That must be some sort of magical fucking pills (works as a verb and adjective) since they only cost $9 per month at Wal-Mart and $4 per month at Target (yes I fucking googled it). Also last time I checked condoms are like .25 cents each.
But maybe the female student population of Georgetown cant do basic math since she went on to say "Forty percent of female students at
Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy." [no citation, I'd never hire her as a lawyer] She also said "Women employed in low wage jobs without contraceptive coverage face the same choice," reality check, most low wage jobs dont even HAVE health insurance. Hell most median jobs only have HDHP HSA
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd hearing.pdf
Her entire argument was farcical, or you might say designed to provoke a response. Of course Rush Limbaugh is an idiot, who makes the entire Republican party look like idiots, and I have no idea why they pander to him, but he took the bait. Now the entire argument has changed into "conservatives hate women." Which is a good sell in an election year.