lol. Washington Post, Jon Stewart, & the NY times for sources?
try adding some credibility and get Olberman's commentary.
The Washington Post and NY Times aren't credible sources?
lol. Washington Post, Jon Stewart, & the NY times for sources?
try adding some credibility and get Olberman's commentary.
lol. Washington Post, Jon Stewart, & the NY times for sources?
try adding some credibility and get Olberman's commentary.
WTF?
Here's you're freedom until I deem otherwise???
Just because it's stuff the Repubs don't want to hear doesn't mean it's unprofessional news.
WTF?
Here's you're freedom until I deem otherwise???
How about you debate what's inside the article instead of who created the article?
lol. Washington Post, Jon Stewart, & the NY times for sources?
try adding some credibility and get Olberman's commentary.
Did you quote the wrong guy db?
you already know how I feel about your debate skills.
Outside the Democrat Base? No.
There's a big marketplace for people that need to have the world interpreted for them.Then there's no such thing as a credible news source.
FYI if this thread devolves into more personal attacks , it will be closed as well.
Do you believe Fox News is credible, Amstel?
It's impossible to separate the two. The entire article you source stems from the author.How about you debate what's inside the article instead of who created the article?
The unbearably obvious implication of these quotes, and of the title of the rally itself, is . . .
As high-minded as that may sound, the real point of stressing the rally's apolitical goals was political in nature. . .
The intent of Palin's quotes were even more obvious. . .
She also implied . . .