Ontopic Poo-litical Thrad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did you hear about his idea to offer everyone credits (not dollars, a whole new currency system) they can use to pay other people to do things for them?

I have not though I do think he is far and away the most honest person in the race as at least he straight up says look man, I'm trying to buy your vote, I'm literally trying to give you money.
His talks on automation making large numbers of human workers obsolete is forward thinking as well.
And he just plain doesn't give off that slimy politician vibe...yet anyway.
 
  • Gravy
Reactions: OOD
He hates dogs. It shows in his tweets and actions. “Died like a dog” “Lost like a dog” etc. The kid(s) couldn’t have dogs.

Of all the things you've said about Trump here this is the one that could really change some hearts and minds.
 
Bernie has literally the same concerns that he's had for the past 40 years. How is that not honesty?

I'd put him in second place. He is honest about what his policies and ideas and goals are.
The downside is the 40+ years. The guy's been at some public trough or another since I was a kid. For all his grandiose ideas on labor and a market economy he probably hasn't earned a paycheck that wasn't full of tax dollars since his 30s and he's 78 now.
Maybe he wrote a couple books or something idk.
 
  • Gravy
Reactions: nukes
I'd put him in second place. He is honest about what his policies and ideas and goals are.
The downside is the 40+ years. The guy's been at some public trough or another since I was a kid. For all his grandiose ideas on labor and a market economy he probably hasn't earned a paycheck that wasn't full of tax dollars since his 30s and he's 78 now.
Maybe he wrote a couple books or something idk.
No, he's just been advocating for his constituents successfully enough that they have kept him in office without the need for corporate donations.

I don't get this shit. People that have had a real job arent qualified, but people that havent in so many years also arent? It cant be both.
 
Wages have been stagnant longer than I've been alive but productivity has steadily climbed.

When you agreed to do X work for X compensation in return, you just determined your value.

From the other side, when the employer can get enough people to do the work to whatever standard for X, the job is worth X. When they can't, they have to offer more pay until they can.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.