By who?Of course there were absolutely no kickbacks when this legislation got passed in the first place
You remember when Comcast shook Netflix down for more money by deliberately slowing down their service?you guys remember all those years we never had NN and had to pay extra to visit youtube and amazon?
In that time the bandwidth being used by youtube and Netflix was minimal compared to today. Fuck, back then Netflix was a DVD rental company.you guys remember all those years we never had NN and had to pay extra to visit youtube and amazon?
it was also long before ISPs had a stake in their own media companiesIn that time the bandwidth being used by youtube and Netflix was minimal compared to today. Fuck, back then Netflix was a DVD rental company.
It makes no sense for wickie to post logical thoughts as that wouldn't help him troll.it was also long before ISPs had a stake in their own media companies
back when ISPs were providing a dumb pipe and little else it was unnecessary. now the people who control access to the internet have a financial stake in making sure you visit the sites they prefer
it makes no sense for people to think the internet today is the same as it was in 2007
They would only be up in arms if they were told to be up in arms.I bet if the conservatives here were being charged more to watch fox news or read their white supremacy literature on breitbart they'd be up in arms about it
[GIPHY="up in arms"]https://media3.giphy.com/media/m3cvEQmDA5pIY/giphy.gif[/GIPHY]
[GIPHY="up in arms"]https://media3.giphy.com/media/m3cvEQmDA5pIY/giphy.gif[/GIPHY]
What did you do then, throw him a nickel?
I don't get this net neutrality.
Are you telling me, you have to pay an extra 10 bucks in addition to whatever your ISP is charging you so that you can visit yutub?