If the baby is confirmed terminally ill, what's the problem with them deciding on euthanasia? I don't see this as much difference as a person being a in coma and the family deciding not to continue life support.
theacoustician said:If the baby is confirmed terminally ill, what's the problem with them deciding on euthanasia? I don't see this as much difference as a person being a in coma and the family deciding not to continue life support.
ieholly said:i agree. i don't see a difference.
http://uselessforum.com/arcade.php?do=play&gameid=6PancakeWagon said:if it's ok for babies, what about terminal tetris patients. where do you draw the line?
Coqui said:Dr. Kevorkian is screaming in his cell right now. (Is he actually in jail?)
yepCoqui said:Dr. Kevorkian is screaming in his cell right now. (Is he actually in jail?)
You betcha, s are slightly less fuel efficientBigDov said:MPI = Miles Per Infant?
ChikkenNoodul said:You betcha, s are slightly less fuel efficient
Damn thats a good 80s movie.BigDov said:I figured the s that got created from a meteor passing too close to Earth would have been a little more efficient than most...... damn.
Those ones perhaps, due to the high radiation content.BigDov said:I figured the s that got created from a meteor passing too close to Earth would have been a little more efficient than most...... damn.
jaxxor said:it's the Netherlands. I fail to see what that has to do with the US and by convoluted extension John Kerry