probably the same reason australians are always drunk and beating their wives
Spoken word shouldn't ever get someone arrested. Physically doing something is much different.
The government in power is the representation of the people. They put them there.
The laws are representations of the desires of the people. They put them there.
See, a Flynavy Vs. Harold show is one I'd buy tickets for
I disagree. What you're saying is that the law should only ever be reactive. Hopefully you can understand why this would be a nightmare, and why societies typically do, in fact, act on threats.
I think you two are well matched internet debaters. Nobody else i know of can keep up with either of you, except each of you, does that make sense?I don't understand this.
I don't understand this.
Yes you should only ever be arrested for something you've actually done.
So you'd throw conspiracy charges right out the window... wait for someone to comit murder before you arrest them for conspiracy to do so?
I think you two are well matched internet debaters. Nobody else i know of can keep up with either of you, except each of you, does that make sense?