How do they know the donor is telling the truth?
They don't. That's the only reason they have to do testing in the first place.
Then there is not point screen these people if:
a) They don't know if they are telling the truth.
b) They test anyway.
So therefor I stand by my original comment "stupid f*ckers"..
The point of screening the people is to save 30 minutes of wasted time and resources.
What time, what resources? You said they test anyway.. So really they would actually be wasting time with the screening..
After the screening, they need to take up a bed, needles, Blood pressure monitors, etc. (resources)
You also will be lying down for 5-15 minutes while you donate, not including the time needed to prepare your arm for donation, take the extra blood out for testing, bandage the puncture, sit you in the recovery area (time)
And assuming you do feel faint while donating, an extra person will need to be assigned to you to make sure you can finish the donation, walk to the recovery area, and monitor you while you recover. (time and resources)
All that and tainted blood can still get through..
I know you see my point..
Yes it can still get through.
But I know you can see my point that asking will prevent a fair majority of it coming through seeing as most won't lie if they know they have it.
But it's also stopping a lot of untainted blood coming through..
the rule was really put in place cause republicans don't want no gay blood in em, cause they may catch the gay.
the rule was really put in place cause republicans don't want no gay blood in em, cause they may catch the gay.
Hence the mention I said that they should change that to 1 year/6months timeframe.