Ontopic Poo-litical Thrad

Status
Not open for further replies.
This just in, courtesy of the hatebox:

Hillary, sour grapes, created the entire Russian collusion hoax because she can’t get over losing and won’t shut up about it, all because PMS.

I don’t recall H Clinton publicly speaking about the election in recent history. Some of these folks are the textbook definition of projection.

I feel sorry for the people that buy into this shit, like the MAGA lady in Michigan, or the other one who was oblivious to everything because of constant FAUX News addiction.
 
Ol’ Limbaugh just couldn’t help but throw in the “PMS” jab, being the immature sexist he is and all.
 
A bunch of other little things as well. She wore a brooch made famous by (I think) her mother, it was made famous by a picture taken of her mother wearing it after her husband had died. The photo is called A Queen in Mourning or something similar.

The Queen is a vicious one with her side-eye.
 
  • Love
  • Gravy
Reactions: Ledboots and adi
I kind of doubt the "people of Burma" felt such love and admiration towards their colonial oppressors they all got together and pitched in to bestow upon them a gift of rubies.
That sounds like the victors writing the history again.
More likely was some politician who got rich off the backs of the peasants doing it to kiss the queens ass.
 
I kind of doubt the "people of Burma" felt such love and admiration towards their colonial oppressors they all got together and pitched in to bestow upon them a gift of rubies.
That sounds like the victors writing the history again.
More likely was some politician who got rich off the backs of the peasants doing it to kiss the queens ass.
The British Empire were notorious thieves and occupiers since it's inception. Ask the Irish. India.
Massachusetts.
 
  • Gravy
Reactions: HipHugHer
I kind of doubt the "people of Burma" felt such love and admiration towards their colonial oppressors they all got together and pitched in to bestow upon them a gift of rubies.
That sounds like the victors writing the history again.
More likely was some politician who got rich off the backs of the peasants doing it to kiss the queens ass.
Dude, just google before you say stuff.
 
Dude, just google before you say stuff.


The rubies were taken from a necklace presented to the previous queen while Burma was still under British rule.

Try googling something a little more in depth than a royalty fan blog.
 
  • Gravy
Reactions: nukes
The rubies were taken from a necklace presented to the previous queen while Burma was still under British rule.

Try googling something a little more in depth than a royalty fan blog.
So it was still a gift from the government, and therefore the people, of Burma? So you're still wrong?

It was, quite literally, the very first link that pulled up that was not about Trump and the Queen. I put no more effort into it than you did with your shitposting.
 
So it was still a gift from the government, and therefore the people, of Burma? So you're still wrong?

It was, quite literally, the very first link that pulled up that was not about Trump and the Queen. I put no more effort into it than you did with your shitposting.

It's a dumb phrase. The "people of" anywhere don't have some monolith hive mind, especially when it comes to political leaders. It reads like propaganda.

If I sent Trump some jewellery and told him it's from "the people of UF" does that make it so? It implies he's so well liked here we all sent him jewellery to show our appreciation. Is that true?

I bet given a choice a lot of "people of Burma" would rather not sent that hag any of their riches either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.