GAY Combo Breaker Spam Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Amstel said:
Right? Today it seems that kids are raised to measure their happiness by external quantifiers to establish victim-hood and worthiness. Their view of people who are generally happy is that they must be ignoring reality.

I also think increased screen time away from work decreases non-screen time overall happiness.
Click to expand...
Its interesting that you agree with that definition of success but keep trying to make me feel bad by pointing out I'm still in college.

It's also interesting that you agree with that definition but are divorced.
 
Amstel said:
I think if your team won you'd be glowing with the wisdom of the founders, but since it didn't go that way, EC=bad. SCOTUS setup=Bad. Must destroy them.

The founders wanted to make sure small states had a say and that a few cities & states didn't run the country.

If it was only 'popular vote' candidates would go to where they needed to be popular only. Trump would have played that way. Did Hills not get the media message 'road to 270'? It seemed everyone else did.
Click to expand...
Still can't stop talking about the election huh? Wow. Please talk about Hillary in the political thread. Thanks.
 
Mr. Asa said:
Its interesting that you agree with that definition of success but keep trying to make me feel bad by pointing out I'm still in college.
Click to expand...
You do that all by yourself.

Mr. Asa said:
It's also interesting that you agree with that definition but are divorced.
Click to expand...
You think can't be divorced & successful at the same time? :lol:
 
wetwille said:
Nobody, you useless, spent load.
Click to expand...
Mr. Asa said:
So you have amstel on ignore. Good to know
Click to expand...
yeah this is the second time someone's quoted @Amstel and he couldn't see it.

FYI @wetwille if you have someone on ignore, you won't see their posts in the first place, but also if someone else quotes them, you'll see only their reply with no indication as to for whom the reply is meant (or that it's meant for anyone in particular).
 
  • Gravy
Reactions: wetwillie
august said:
yeah this is the second time someone's quoted @Amstel and he couldn't see it.

FYI @wetwille if you have someone on ignore, you won't see their posts in the first place, but also if someone else quotes them, you'll see only their reply with no indication as to for whom the reply is meant (or that it's meant for anyone in particular).
Click to expand...
Well if that's an upgrade I can only imagine it was intended to cause a lot of confusion and arguments. Oh yeah, I'm at UF.

That's not how it worked before. hmm, no telling when the change occurred - I just assumed Amstel was taking a break. He's not all bad, I just don't care for his thoughts on poor people sometimes. That and using denigrating terms for a nationality component he and I have in common. Guess I have to un-ignore him. Nobody else is on that list. ;)
 
Mr. Asa said:
You're the one that agreed with that definition, not me.
Click to expand...
Amstel thinks everyone else is as deluded as himself. It's laughable to think the he doesn't see money as primary evidence of success, but he has no conscious understanding of himself. He's always projecting so he does recognize it subconsciously at least.
 
  • Gravy
Reactions: Jehannum, wetwillie and Mr. Argumentor
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back