Why is everyone concerning themselves with what someone else wants to do with their body
because if you break the security seal you void the warranty
Why is everyone concerning themselves with what someone else wants to do with their body
is this more than putting cat food in a bowl?Tl;dr
Tl;dr
this is one of those things that I don't have nearly enough information to form an opinion about but I feel like it's not as cut & dry as I'd like it to be
All the Captain-save-a-child's around here.Why is everyone concerning themselves with what someone else wants to do with their body
All that can absolutely be changed! What more do you want?regardless of what we know or don't know about the legal-eze, wouldn't it be safe to say that whatever the legal process *chosen by few to apply to all* that may or may not be involved in considering changing your sex SHOULD also be used for smoking/voting/alcohol/military service/etc?
If not, why not?
regardless of what we know or don't know about the legal-eze, wouldn't it be safe to say that whatever the legal process *chosen by few to apply to all* that may or may not be involved in considering changing your sex SHOULD also be used for smoking/voting/alcohol/military service/etc?
If not, why not?
Unless you're 15 and in Oregon and want to change gender then I don't really understand what there is to talk about here
No it shouldn't because those things are not related. Being of a certain age does not grant you the ability to make decisions in every facet of life while at some ages one may be able to decide certain things better than others.
If your only argument against this is "well they can't smoke until they're 18" then you're not asking any worthwhile questions.
As has been said numerous times in this thread, who cares? Aren't you FOR states rights? Or are you only for states rights when its inline with your thinking?My point is that for some reason we've decided that with 'some' set non-parenting influence it's ok to change your sex, but no matter what, we won't allow you to vote.
That doesn't make any sense. And my point to @APRIL, is that all we're doing with legislatures these days is paying them a fortune to deliberate on the narrowest scope of things that may not really need to wait until someone is 18. Lower the legal age of everything to 15 and get information out there to them. Smoking is bad, here's why. Sex is fine as soon as you feel the urge, but maybe you want to lasso those hormones for 10 seconds while you put a condom on it while you're staring that that V. Oh, and if you're feeling feminine and want your dick cut off so you can see what a d inside you feels like, etc, here's what's going on.
Give them all of the information. This 'picking and choosing' what is and isn't relative to the parental guardians is a crock of shit designed to give legislators something to do with their time and our $.
Huh? Where are you going with this?As has been said numerous times in this thread, who cares? Aren't you FOR states rights? Or are you only for states rights when its inline with your thinking?
Careful, that's a rational argument. He doesn't know how to deal with thoseAren't you FOR states rights?
Probably because the word tattoo never came up in the discussion. Why would it?Huh? Where are you going with this?
OR has come up with some rule that allows a 15yr old to change their sex without parental input, but won't allow them to get a tattoo, etc. I'd like to know how a small number of adults logically came to that decision that applies to everyone.
Comparing it to tattoos and voting isn't helping. Argue it as a stand alone topic cause otherwise it's distracting.Huh? Where are you going with this?
OR has come up with some rule that allows a 15yr old to change their sex without parental input, but won't allow them to get a tattoo, etc. I'd like to know how a small number of adults logically came to that decision that applies to everyone.