Thread We should make common sense a high school requirement.

that's how I know you're wrong

images
 
you're too stupid to read now run along knowing you've been beaten. shoo

You're not going to pull this Amstel bullshit on me. If you got something that is factual and proves me wrong, then show it and I will accept it, else stop acting like a fucking retarded right winger.
 
you are comparing me to amstel but are clearly too lazy to read the page. :waw:

316.027 Crash involving death or personal injuries.--

(1)(a) The driver of any vehicle involved in a crash resulting in injury of any person must immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the crash, or as close thereto as possible, and must remain at the scene of the crash until he or she has fulfilled the requirements of s. 316.062. Any person who willfully violates this paragraph is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

316.062 Duty to give information and render aid.--

(1) The driver of any vehicle involved in a crash resulting in injury to or death of any person or damage to any vehicle or other property which is driven or attended by any person shall give his or her name, address, and the registration number of the vehicle he or she is driving, and shall upon request and if available exhibit his or her license or permit to drive, to any person injured in such crash or to the driver or occupant of or person attending any vehicle or other property damaged in the crash and shall give such information and, upon request, exhibit such license or permit to any police officer at the scene of the crash or who is investigating the crash and shall render to any person injured in the crash reasonable assistance, including the carrying, or the making of arrangements for the carrying, of such person to a physician, surgeon, or hospital for medical or surgical treatment if it is apparent that treatment is necessary, or if such carrying is requested by the injured person.
 
OMFG.. after all that there is absolutely nothing new in there at all.. *sigh*

We have discussed the injury part. You assume that the injury was obvious, I'm not so sure it was obvious thus the driver would not be required to stop.
 
the girl was taken from the scene to the hospital to have her vagina stitched up. that is an injury. the driver fled the scene. that is a felony. they are obligated to stay at the scene and provide identification. what don't you understand here besides intentionally being a moron?
 
the girl was taken from the scene to the hospital to have her vagina stitched up. that is an injury. the driver fled the scene. that is a felony. they are obligated to stay at the scene and provide identification. what don't you understand here besides intentionally being a moron?

wow..... this is really fucking funny how retarded you are being by refusing to even acknowledge what I am saying and just repeating yourself over and over again. Very much like the right wingers do when you try to debate shit with them.

Let's break this shit down for you then.

We both know the girl was injured.

We both know that if you hit someone with your car, that you must stop.

What we both don't know is how obvious the injury was at the scene at the time of the accident.

I'm simply putting forth the idea that the driver did not know the extent or even existence of an injury, and therefor didn't feel the need to stay around. I'm pretty sure a bleeding vagina is not something you can spot easily.