or maybe not, but there is a woman counterpart to offset his many lays. it's a mathematical certainty.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/w...5dede4acff505c&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
i love how simple this is, and that i've never even thought about it before. also, if the lifetime median is 7 i'm not doing too badly.
EVERYONE knows men are promiscuous by nature. It’s part of the genetic strategy that evolved to help men spread their genes far and wide. The strategy is different for a woman, who has to go through so much just to have a baby and then nurture it. She is genetically programmed to want just one man who will stick with her and help raise their children.
Surveys bear this out. In study after study and in country after country, men report more, often many more, sexual partners than women.
One survey, recently reported by the federal government, concluded that men had a median of seven female sex partners. Women had a median of four male sex partners. Another study, by British researchers, stated that men had 12.7 heterosexual partners in their lifetimes and women had 6.5.
But there is just one problem, mathematicians say. It is logically impossible for heterosexual men to have more partners on average than heterosexual women. Those survey results cannot be correct.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/w...5dede4acff505c&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
i love how simple this is, and that i've never even thought about it before. also, if the lifetime median is 7 i'm not doing too badly.
Last edited: