16 & 17. However, they might have been in the special ed. program so that pushes it more into the creepy zone.How much underage were these lads?
did you quote me & tag me in same post?16 & 17. However, they might have been in the special ed. program so that pushes it more into the creepy zone.
@Darth Handsome - try not to be jealous of them.
your "plan" fizzled out, I didnt get a notification for the mention. Somebody's got this forum running like a top
Working overtime makes me evil.
16 & 17. However, they might have been in the special ed. program so that pushes it more into the creepy zone.
@Darth Handsome - try not to be jealous of them.
Not sure, as nukes noted, she isn't "bad", might actually be kinda cute if she wasn't sitting there like a deer in the headlights in court.Wonder what issues she's got going on with that thing only retards will hit it.
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.tell us more.
She's not ugly. She could get laid every night by a handsome hunk 18 or older whom she doesn't teach.
But would you bang her? You know, theoretically.I respectfully disagree. She is f u g l y and has a horrid body.
But would you bang her? You know, theoretically.
Ok, after looking at more pics( I stumbled on her story looking for the one at my old H.S.) I have to agree. I though maybe it would get better than the shot I saw. Sadly no.Thin lips, a jut jaw, and baby fat boobs don’t do it for me.