For you? Long enough to get proof that it didn't "happen in Canada"So during our sexual assault, how long are we supposed to let the video run? Like as long as they want to keep doing it?
Enough to get evidence, then we can shank him, or what?
Enquiring minds want to know.
I actually recorded verbal, physical threats once that were apparently enough for the cop to arrest the guy just to diffuse the situation. Charged him with some bullshit little class C (the lowest here) misdemeanor. Guy was out in a few hours and nothing ever came of it. Probably got dismissed or at worst slapped with $100 fine a year later or something.If someone is making verbal threats to me, I can see myself recording that. If I can get to my phone fast enough before they follow through. With my luck, I'd get a video of a fist flying towards me.
100% agreed.Again it's situational. If the guy has a gun and wants my wallet, people say just give up the wallet. Cooperate and hopefully live. Ok, I can agree with that. But in situations where they demand you get in their car or something like that, you absolutely must fight to get away. Gun or no gun. If you get in that car you are at their mercy. I'd rather run and zig zag gunfire than get in that car or van. But people do freeze because it's a situation they've never been confronted with. It's scary out there sometimes.
I think a good ploy these days would to wipe out the phone and hold it in your non-dominant hand. When they make a lunge for it you cold-cock them with the better hand. Just sayin. Watched a cop fighting/wrestling with this guy and the cop's technique included repeatedly trying to grab the guys junk with a pinching grip. Appeared to be very distracting to the perp.If someone is making verbal threats to me, I can see myself recording that. If I can get to my phone fast enough before they follow through. With my luck, I'd get a video of a fist flying towards me.
No I didn’t. I never mentioned what I think is okay pertaining to the age of consent. I merely said what I’ve heard from gay friends, and in the press straight out of the Milo’s mouth. It’s the way gay men see it, or most of them, or at least the ones I’ve known AS FRIENDS.Guy, by presenting your argument as a counter to what was being said, you were saying it was ok. You didn't explicitly state it, but by using it to back up your points you implicitly were saying ok.
As for Milo, fuck anything and everything that hate monger said. Even if it accurately reflects the world I guarantee someone worth a shit also said it.
Off topic objectification of the immigrant - reported!I dont care what your friends think. I'm not talking to them about this issue for one, for another who knows if their minds have changed on this matter?
If you want to stop talking about this, as you appear to, just say what you personally believe. Until then, the fact that you continue to refuse to pass judgment (in addition to everything else I've mentioned) is most likely going to be percieved as you saying it is ok.
Fine. I disapprove if it breaks the 1/2 + 7 standard.No one is disputing what the norm is. However, as has been stated, the norm is not always right.
Agreement or disapproval of the norm is what is being discussed
It's houseboy/sugar daddy complex.Pondering . . do young gay dudes want to hookup with older dudes the same way many young straight guys want to HU with older women? IF so, do older gay guys find that a turn on, like many older women do?