1. No one is really using all the power of the current generation of systems anyways.elpmis said:okay, so after a day or so at E3, my understanding is that Nintendo is pretty much done for. I was psyched when i saw footage of the console and heard about the downloadable nintendo games(even though i already have them all on my pc). Fast forward to an actual article leaked about the raw performance of revolution. the article explained how xbox 360 was 13-15 times more powerful than xbox and ps3 was 35 time as powerful as its predecessor. Nintendo released that revolution was 2-3 times as powerful. wtf. Is nintendo kidding? All i can say is they better have some flipping amazing new game concepts with revolution or they are soon to suffer the same fate sega did.
im getting a ps3.
2. How the hell can people be doing these comparisons? No one has any clue what the hell Nintendo's Hollywood chip even is yet or what the full system specs are. Comparing MS and Sony at this point is retarded because Sony is using a processor no one has ever seen before. The only objective measurement I think can be made at this point is comparing Xbox to Xbox360. Both have clearly defined hardware of known values. Everything else is marketing bullshit till then.