I mean, I agree with you, but the other option aint so grand either. Not sure which I'd personally rather do...
How can a person be 100% sure that a person is guilty?
I'm all for torture and mutilation of those guilty of child murder. Anything and everything must be an option when trying to deter this from happening..
I'd be all for the death penalty if it actually served as a deterrent, and if it were the cheaper option, and if each sentence were carried out on pay per view, and if we were 100% certain the person in question was the guilty party, and if the person carrying out the sentence was god. Unfortunately, none of this applies, so I think it's a horrible idea.
Short of thousands of people seeing the person doing it right infront of them, I don't think you can. I guess that's why they say 'reasonable doubt'.
For reals, I don't understand why people who are convicted of child rape (even baby rape a lot) are allowed to live.
It's never a cheaper option, it costs the state a buttload of dough.
Computers don't lie and if you got thousands of baby porn pics on there then you're pretty sick.
As opposed to the tens (maybe even hundreds??) of thousands it costs to keep someone in prison each year?
Absolutely true, but pictures don't prove that the individual has actually raped a child themself.
Present value, bla bla bla, no.
there are several cases where people have been set free when the truth was discovered. sometimes many years later.I mean, I agree with you, but the other option aint so grand either. Not sure which I'd personally rather do...
child rappers should also be killed.Plus, child rapers tend to get offed in prison anyway.....