http://www.smh.com.au/world/plane-w...ot-mh370-authorities-say-20151012-gk7j71.html
This story just get's odder and odder.
If they went to the island but the locals say 'we know nothing' why dismiss the story without bringing the witness who found it to show them what he found
also, every single article on this story has the details on who found it so different. Some say it was a woman, some say a guy claiming his aunt found it. This is the only story where it actually gives a name.
granted, a flyover 'should' show something because a plane that size can't crash in the jungle without leaving a rather substantial impact furrow.
And why would a teenage kid living in the remote phillipines even make up a story of that magnitude.
It just seems weird how fast the story got dismissed, and the reasons behind it so inconsistent from telling to telling.
This story just get's odder and odder.
If they went to the island but the locals say 'we know nothing' why dismiss the story without bringing the witness who found it to show them what he found
also, every single article on this story has the details on who found it so different. Some say it was a woman, some say a guy claiming his aunt found it. This is the only story where it actually gives a name.
granted, a flyover 'should' show something because a plane that size can't crash in the jungle without leaving a rather substantial impact furrow.
And why would a teenage kid living in the remote phillipines even make up a story of that magnitude.
It just seems weird how fast the story got dismissed, and the reasons behind it so inconsistent from telling to telling.
