It's a British thing. That's why we are mostly unaware.
Well, he's pretty well known internationally considering he's painted in Israel, Brazil, Britain, Ireland and a lot of other countries.
It's art, not just graffiti Duke, and I IMed some guy years ago who did graf in Oregon and he was telling me about the prison sentences you can get, like wtf? I know quite a lot of graffiti artists, they all pretty much paint on walls they're given permission to use because they're very talented people let them do it, but why should you get put in prison for it?
It is defacing property that is not yours. That's why.
You know America; if it does not happen in our bubble, it never happened.
It is defacing property that is not yours. That's why.
*cough*vandalism*cough*
vandalism: defacement of public or private property without owner's permissionNot really. Vandalism implies that you're ruining something.
Property's a lose term anyway, it's not like real grafiti artists go and paint on peoples houses, that's not cool. Painting on community property is a great idea though, I know schools that have huge spaces for people to paint on and I think any council property is fair game. Nothing wrong with brightening the place up, if anything we should be thanking people for making the cities more interesting and attractive.
Not really. Vandalism implies that you're ruining something.
Property's a lose term anyway, it's not like real grafiti artists go and paint on peoples houses, that's not cool. Painting on community property is a great idea though, I know schools that have huge spaces for people to paint on and I think any council property is fair game. Nothing wrong with brightening the place up, if anything we should be thanking people for making the cities more interesting and attractive.
the only place you see really high quality graffiti is where it is allowed, or where the risk of being caught despite spending a large amount of time in the same place is low. most places all you see is bullshit tagging.imo, a wall thats been all painted up is ruined. this = vandalism.
thats the problem, it's all subjective to ones opinion on what's interesting and attractive, and what's just stupid.
here in the states though, most graffiti has zero meaning, its someone writing their name or something gay like that. very rarely do you come across a gem from someone with actual talent spray painting something with actual meaning.
Those who don't own any always seem to have that view.You have an interesting stance on property rights.
imo, a wall thats been all painted up is ruined. this = vandalism.
thats the problem, it's all subjective to ones opinion on what's interesting and attractive, and what's just stupid.
here in the states though, most graffiti has zero meaning, its someone writing their name or something gay like that. very rarely do you come across a gem from someone with actual talent spray painting something with actual meaning.
the only place you see really high quality graffiti is where it is allowed, or where the risk of being caught despite spending a large amount of time in the same place is low. most places all you see is bullshit tagging.
the low risk of being caught thing is why train cars often have decent work on them. if a car spends a chunk of time in an isolated yard someone can spend some time working on a piece without worrying about getting caught.
Very nice, which one is it? I remember when I went to Glastonbury 07 and he'd reinacted the stone circle with toilets and graf I was sooooo confused.
I just brought a John Bergerman (I think that's his name) print I think it's 6/100 and signed, figure it'll be worth something the more famous he gets.