gee you think?
waw's one sided image was proof of that, it's like a giant political add. OMG HE DID THIS but we aren't gonna mention this, but compare it to the guy WHO DID THIS but we won't tell motives or anything else about the case. AND THE OUTCOME IS DIFFERENT!!!~! OMG
Juries are often very reasonable. 12 average people, when they sit down to discuss something, can draw extraordinarily lucid conclusions.
Butler v. Perry, 240 U.S. 328 (1916)Trolololo.
Jury duty is also a violation of the 13th amendment, imo.
There's the somewhat uncommon .38 Super I suppose, available in the 1911 platform and perhaps some conversions.Is there no such thing as a .38 semi-automatic?
Butler v. Perry, 240 U.S. 328 (1916)
"the term "involuntary servitude" was intended to cover those forms of compulsory labor akin to African slavery...was not intended to interdict enforcement of those duties which individuals owe to the state, such as services in the army, militia, on the jury, etc. The great purpose in view was liberty under the protection of effective government, not the destruction of the latter by depriving it of essential powers."
"There is no merit in the claim that a man's labor is property, the taking of which without compensation by the state...violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."
Lexis Nexis-ing actually. It's solid reasoning though, and much more direct than current Supreme Court rulings. The 13th amendment was passed specifically to outlaw slavery and debt bondage. It wasn't intended (remember ruling on the intent, and there fore application of statuary law is what judges do) to limit the powers of state/federal government in any way except with regards to slavery.Congratulations on googling intellectually dishonest court rulings. An opinion of the system garnered by an agent of the system isn't compelling in the least.
9mm is essentially .38.
.38 S&W is rimmed cartridge.
.38 Spc is popular revolver cartridge and rimmed.
There's also .380...
do you not agree there are doubts that have been cast upon the evidence in this case? I'm debating above the belt but you and duke have gone for the "oh, he works for cnn" bullshit to bolster an argument, as if that means anything here. I don't work for the news and in that regard that makes none of us 3 any different. lame tactics.
There's the somewhat uncommon .38 Super I suppose, available in the 1911 platform and perhaps some conversions.
I would highly doubt that would be the case though, .38 revolvers are/were cheaply available, particularly to folks obtaining them outside of legal means.
ZRH noted that 9mm is essentially .38" in diameter, but the bullet weights are different enough that I would presume they would be able to determine the difference.
I don't know anything about this case, but that just strikes me as odd, which is why I commented.
Lexis Nexis-ing actually. It's solid reasoning though, and much more direct than current Supreme Court rulings. The 13th amendment was passed specifically to outlaw slavery and debt bondage. It wasn't intended (remember ruling on the intent, and there fore application of statuary law is what judges do) to limit the powers of state/federal government in any way except with regards to slavery.
Either way, Article One, section 8, clause 18:gives congress the ability to grant the judiciary the power to carry out it's constitutional duty, one of which is a trial by jury. (I am not 100% sure on this but it makes sense) It's the same reason grand juries can issue supoenas and you can be held in summary contempt.
Uh, yes, uncommon. Just because you can find it for sale doesn't mean that it's common.