smileynev vs maddox...

fly

omg
Oct 1, 2004
79,288
27,283
1,323
Marklar
₥85,294
Steam
mattressfish
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=episode3

I didn't think it was possible to be more unimpressed with Star Wars. Today, I stand corrected. If you were unfortunate enough to hear your stupid co-workers yammering on about Lucas' latest shit burger, you might have heard them saying something like "I didn't like the first two, but this one was good!" When I ask why, these people have trouble responding because it's hard to talk with George Lucas' flaccid penis in their collective mouths. Perhaps the question I should be asking is "why didn't you like the other two movies if you liked this one?" Nothing has changed. You have the same vacant-looking actors running around, aimlessly bumping into things, an army of stupid, sensitive robots, and dialogue clumsy enough to warrant putting a handicap sticker on George Lucas' car.

To Lucas' credit, he was tacitly shamed into not giving Jar Jar any talking lines in this movie. With Jar Jar's character no longer speaking to annoy you, Lucas filled the void by giving every robot in the movie stupid toy noises. So instead of doing something cool like having the robots chase after screaming children, they bitch and moan and say things like "ow" when they get their prosthetic limbs chopped off. Even worse are the idiots who scarf down these sub-childish morsels of comedic relief, playing into Lucas' shallow theatrics so easily that you could sell these people hookers in a vagina storm.

Before I go on, I have to address something that all you stupid Star Wars nerds are probably thinking right about now: "But Maddox, it's a movie made for kids, what do you expect?!" Even Lucas stated in an interview with the BBC that:

"The movies are for children but [the fans] don't want to admit that."

Oh really? It just so happens that this "children's movie" has a scene where a guy gets his hands chopped off, a graphic decapitation, the wanton slaughter of children (the highlight of any movie), and the coolest scene in any space action movie starring Ewan McGregor: Anakin getting his legs chopped off as his stumps catch fire while his face melts. By the way, if you haven't seen this movie yet, don't read the previous sentence.

The most damning thing about this epic waste of time is the piecemeal plot thatched together with just enough good will and nostalgia to pacify the average idiot (i.e., you). Besides all the jedis in the movie being morons who are unable to detect conspiracies involving the cooperation of thousands of soldiers, Lucas does his best to make this movie extra insulting to our intelligence:

Senator Palpatine seduces Anakin to the dark side in about as much time as it takes for you to finish reading this sentence. Nevermind the fact that Anakin knows Palpatine is a Sith lord before accepting his offer, or that Sith lords are known for doing things like, oh.. I don't know, KILLING MILLIONS OF PEOPLE. Anakin is on a mission to save his wife, Padme, from certain death! Or at least likely death. Okay, it was a dream. But it seemed pretty real during the flashback sequence, so Anakin has no reason not to believe this dream will come true, as is the tendency of dreams.

Near the end, Lucas takes a shit on the script and makes his crew translate it into an ending that putters across the finish line. The product is a scene where Anakin tries to literally choke Padme using the force:

Yes, that's right. The entire reason Anakin switched to the dark side becomes unraveled when he tries to kill Padme, who was the reason he switched to the dark side to begin with. Oops! Of course, Star Wars apologists will try to point out that Anakin was already under the influence of the "dark side" at this point. So that's why the first thing he asks as Darth Vader is whether Padme is safe, right you morons?

Even after pointing out these serious problems with the plot, Star Wars nerds will still try to get you to admit one thing: "you have to admit that the special effects were good, right?"

NEWS FLASH: Episode III had no special effects.

They're not "special effects" anymore when they're found in EVERY SCENE. Lucas has done the seemingly impossible: he has made something that was once so unique that people called it "special" by name, and turned it into something so ordinary that nobody raises an eyebrow during a scene where a guy is having a sword fight on the back of a giant beast. By the way, I have to admit that the creature design was very creative in this episode; modeled after frilled lizards and ticks, Lucas tapped the well of innovation dry on this one. Congratulations Lucas, we don't care about "special" effects anymore.

Speaking of, that reminds me of the character "General Grievous" a bad guy so sinister, his very name stands for PAIN AND SUFFERING. Nice job assholes. Tired of thinking up awesome names like "Lord Dooku" and "Nute Gunray" for your bad guys? Why not just call all your characters "Evil" and "Bad" next time? All Grievous needed was a monacle, and a large black moustache that he could twirl as he cackled "I'll get you, if it's the last thing I do!" Ditch this bullshit.

retort?
 
I don't even have to read that whole thing to know that the only reason he wrote it was to garner the ire of star wars fans the world over. As to why he desire such attention and hate, I think that it feeds some sort of longing desire to be recognized, even spitefully. Something that his father never could give him. It all comes down to daddy, and his unwillingness to show emotion to this poor, poor little boy trapped in a man's body.
 
smileynev said:
I don't even have to read that whole thing to know that the only reason he wrote it was to garner the ire of star wars fans the world over. As to why he desire such attention and hate, I think that it feeds some sort of longing desire to be recognized, even spitefully. Something that his father never could give him. It all comes down to daddy, and his unwillingness to show emotion to this poor, poor little boy trapped in a man's body.
okay. now read it.
 
fly said:
okay. now read it.

I did. It just reaffirms my belief that he is neither an unbiased critic nor a loved son.

The dialogue is unquestionably bland and can be downright corny. But, then again, anyone expecting anything else from a Star Wars movie is a moron to begin with.

Anakin's turn to the darkside was a well developed plot point that ran throughout the prequel trilogy. To say that it just "all of a sudden happened" at the end of ROTS only shows that you cannot connect the simplest of dots that Lucas laid out for you. Love and hate are two opposites of the same type of emotion. Anakin's striking out at Padme is believable beyond reproach given the hurt he must have felt at her alleged betrayal.
 
smileynev said:
I did. It just reaffirms my belief that he is neither an unbiased critic nor a loved son.

The dialogue is unquestionably bland and can be downright corny. But, then again, anyone expecting anything else from a Star Wars movie is a moron to begin with.

Anakin's turn to the darkside was a well developed plot point that ran throughout the prequel trilogy. To say that it just "all of a sudden happened" at the end of ROTS only shows that you cannot connect the simplest of dots that Lucas laid out for you. Love and hate are two opposites of the same type of emotion. Anakin's striking out at Padme is believable beyond reproach given the hurt he must have felt at her alleged betrayal.
BWAHAHAHAHA

You crack me up.
 
This dude's talking like 4, 5, and 6 were any different aside from the special effects...

If anything...the scripts for 4, 5, and 6 were more bland than 1, 2, and 3.


I think he's in denial.
 
wr3kt said:
This dude's talking like 4, 5, and 6 were any different aside from the special effects...

If anything...the scripts for 4, 5, and 6 were more bland than 1, 2, and 3.


I think he's in denial.
All the crap I've read said that Lucas has lost his knack for dialoge. I have no idea tho, as I've only seen 4, 5, and 6 once when they came out.
 
fly said:
All the crap I've read said that Lucas has lost his knack for dialoge. I have no idea tho, as I've only seen 4, 5, and 6 once when they came out.
Hard to lose what you didn't have in the first place...

You saw 4, 5, and 6 when they came out?

YOU"RE OLD.
 
fly said:
All the crap I've read said that Lucas has lost his knack for dialoge. I have no idea tho, as I've only seen 4, 5, and 6 once when they came out.
Like most Star Wars fans then.
 
fly said:
All the crap I've read said that Lucas has lost his knack for dialoge. I have no idea tho, as I've only seen 4, 5, and 6 once when they came out.

When they came out?

I'd say his knack for dialogue wasn't that great to begin with.
 
fly said:
All the crap I've read said that Lucas has lost his knack for dialoge. I have no idea tho, as I've only seen 4, 5, and 6 once when they came out.
Lucas has never had a knack for dialogue, wtf. He comes up with good stories but he's a terrible scriptwriter.
 
smileynev said:
Way to diffuse my awesomely witty retort in relating an abusive and graphic descriptive to you.

I hope you die from lightsaber in your ass.
 
wr3kt said:
Way to diffuse my awesomely witty retort in relating an abusive and graphic descriptive to you.

I hope you die from lightsaber in your ass.
I think it was because of the "read" typo. :(
 
Galen said:
I think it was because of the "read" typo. :(
I can't help it if this place doesn't correct my typos.

This thing needs more Apple-does-everything-for-you intuition.
That way all I have to do is click my single mouse button once and a 3-paragraph insult is generated including footnote definitions for words with more than 6 letters.

LET"S MAC THIS PLACE OUT