WTF Seriously how much doe Aussieland need to be tortured?

Coqui

Piccolo Pete
Oct 14, 2004
35,593
4,667
673
43
Columbus, OH
d036553f-00a4-0717.jpg


Did that work?

Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk

Low cut doesn't count if it's covered up by something else.
 

OzSTEEZ

¡ɟɟo ʞɔnɟ ʇunɔ 'ᴉO
Nov 11, 2008
35,318
9,388
473
40
Oz
plenty of evidence for the other side. like the weather being fucking cold everywhere right now... but like i already said, global warming scientists worked that one into the equation a few years after weather started trending colder again saying global warming will actually cause an ice age or something.

2 cows cause roughly the same amount of greenhouse gases as a person driving a car 15k miles a year. (the research on all this is still pretty new and pretty sketchy, so for arguments sake from what I can find this is a pretty solid number both sides would agree on). there's like 100 million cows in the united states and the latest numbers i can find on how much americans drive sat right around 3 trillion/year so cows emit about as much pollution as half of our driving every year.

we better all turn vegan.


And there we see you have no idea what climate change actually is..
 

OzSTEEZ

¡ɟɟo ʞɔnɟ ʇunɔ 'ᴉO
Nov 11, 2008
35,318
9,388
473
40
Oz
yea, shows my point exactly. changed from global warming to climate change when weather stopped trending up and started going down.

You do know it's hot as hell in the southern hemisphere right now, right?

:waw:
 

fly

Osharts 11
Oct 1, 2004
72,258
23,860
1,073
Steam
mattressfish
plenty of evidence for the other side. like the weather being fucking cold everywhere right now... but like i already said, global warming scientists worked that one into the equation a few years after weather started trending colder again saying global warming will actually cause an ice age or something.

Although I don't necessarily believe that humans may be causing the shit, an average global rise in temperature has always involved extreme weather conditions - hot and cold. It's because there is so much more energy injected into the planet.
 

plot

Morning Boehner
Oct 16, 2006
20,031
4,165
323
kansas city
How much reading of climate change have you actually done?

quite a bit actually, i'm aware the weather changes in different parts. sunny in minnesota, snow in dallas....

my whole point is the original theory of global warming didn't hold up so they've adapted it to whatever current weather patterns are and claiming its all cause of human caused global warming.

you'd kill this whole carbon offset industry/tax if anyone ever found we have very little to do with how the weather changes. just wait till the poles flip, that will be global warming too.
 

OzSTEEZ

¡ɟɟo ʞɔnɟ ʇunɔ 'ᴉO
Nov 11, 2008
35,318
9,388
473
40
Oz
quite a bit actually, i'm aware the weather changes in different parts. sunny in minnesota, snow in dallas....

my whole point is the original theory of global warming didn't hold up so they've adapted it to whatever current weather patterns are and claiming its all cause of human caused global warming.

you'd kill this whole carbon offset industry/tax if anyone ever found we have very little to do with how the weather changes. just wait till the poles flip, that will be global warming too.

The theory hasn't change, just the name. Simply because of the sheer number of moronic people in this world who read "Global Warming", then look out the window to see snow and think "Bullshit!"..
 

plot

Morning Boehner
Oct 16, 2006
20,031
4,165
323
kansas city
hrm.... this 2000 pro-global warming article seems to focus completely on... HOLY SHIT THE GLOBE IS WARMING!
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/26/u...lobal-warming-theory.html?pagewanted=2&src=pm
One of its most striking findings is its conclusion that the upper range of warming over the next 100 years could be even higher than it estimated in 1995, in a worst case raising the average global temperature 11 degrees Fahrenheit from where it was in 1990. By comparison, average temperatures today are only 9 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than they were at the end of the last Ice Age.

what, no warming since 1995? lets change this climate change thing to include volcano's erupting, tsunami's, and snow in the south.
http://www.factsandarts.com/articles/no-significant-global-warming-since-1995/

wait what... "leading scientist" loses critical data that doesn't coincide with his global warming theories?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html


...then there's the whole argument of climate change is always happening, and even if humans do have an impact on it, does it really matter? without our influence the earth might explode anyways. with it it might still explode. or it might make it a paradise. who the fuck knows
 

plot

Morning Boehner
Oct 16, 2006
20,031
4,165
323
kansas city
random googling, go do some research yourself into what the articles claim if you don't think they are reliable.
 

OzSTEEZ

¡ɟɟo ʞɔnɟ ʇunɔ 'ᴉO
Nov 11, 2008
35,318
9,388
473
40
Oz
Random googling will also result in articles that oppose your point of view.

http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazin...rchives/2005/The-Proof-Is-in-the-Science.aspx
THE TWENTIETH CENTURY was the warmest of the past 1,000 years, and 19 of the 20 hottest years on record occurred after 1980. Most of this warming resulted from human activities, not nature, according to the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Composed of 1,500 climatologists, the panel was created in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environmental Program to evaluate climate science as a basis for setting policy. Other groups that agree with the panel’s conclusion include the National Academy of Sciences, the American Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
 

plot

Morning Boehner
Oct 16, 2006
20,031
4,165
323
kansas city
from 2005... 4 years before that whole pesky "we lost critical data" that didn't coincide with what they wanted their end results on temperature to show. not to mention the lack of sharing research information with detractors... really makes one wonder what their agenda is.