so, no evidence? yup
Leave the discussions to the grownups who are paying attention, k?
so, no evidence? yup
Leave the discussions to the grownups who are paying attention, k?
yes, it can. it's a large unreliable data set. those people had no understanding of what they were seeing and we have no evidence that said things weren't just their version of star wars. it can certainly be ignored as invalid because there's nothing to validate it. it's pure speculation, especially since they're all fucking different.Actually, that is the argument you are making. If anything, I stated that a large sample of a population, across the entire cutural, geographical, and historical span of the human timeline, reporting their witness to acts of a supreme being, or their faith in a supreme being, or their interactions with a supreme being, is, scientifically speaking, a rather large data set. Since you want to follow that path, unless you have a pretty valid counter to just discount that data set, it can not be ignored as invalid until proven so.
I never said science disproves god exists. And what scientists have made that argument?Science doesn't actually disprove god exists. In fact, many scientists have made the argument that science, in fact, goes a long way towards proving that there is something more out there, something that 'could' be along the lines of a supreme being.
to call me 'churchy' is really all the proof we need that you aren't really following here, waw.
There are massive amounts of people in Africa that fully believe that raping a virgin will cure them of aids.
Doesn't make it real though.
How do you know? Ever tried it?
Actually, that is the argument you are making. If anything, I stated that a large sample of a population, across the entire cutural, geographical, and historical span of the human timeline, reporting their witness to acts of a supreme being, or their faith in a supreme being, or their interactions with a supreme being, is, scientifically speaking, a rather large data set. Since you want to follow that path, unless you have a pretty valid counter to just discount that data set, it can not be ignored as invalid until proven so.
Science doesn't actually disprove god exists. In fact, many scientists have made the argument that science, in fact, goes a long way towards proving that there is something more out there, something that 'could' be along the lines of a supreme being.