Jehannum
Puts the "pro" in procrastination
You're never going to get to eat a bag of dicks in that program, son.Total Bh move.
You're never going to get to eat a bag of dicks in that program, son.Total Bh move.
You're never going to get to eat a bag of dicks in that program, son.
10 $X = 110 PRINT “Go fuck yourself”
20 GOTO HELL
30 EAT A BAG OF DICKS
10 should really be 100000
I dunno, a decent basic interpreter running that code on a modern PC should almost be able to keep up with valve's bag-of-dick intake.10 should really be 100000
Or maybe arguing over the nanoseconds one's code takes over the other guy's code. Been in this argument too many times and it's one of the reasons I'm leaving coding for good.Nothing says I have a huge programmer ego like dumping shitty/unsafe code on a forum called "useless forums"
What took you so long?Or maybe arguing over the nanoseconds one's code takes over the other guy's code. Been in this argument too many times and it's one of the reasons I'm leaving coding for good.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Be those nanoseconds fasterOr maybe arguing over the nanoseconds one's code takes over the other guy's code. Been in this argument too many times and it's one of the reasons I'm leaving coding for good.
Go look at the code I posted.Or maybe arguing over the nanoseconds one's code takes over the other guy's code. Been in this argument too many times and it's one of the reasons I'm leaving coding for good.
Last couple pages must be some kind of pinnacle of nerdom even for this crowd.
FWIW, I'm pretty sure shit like this matters for the stuff that @gee does.Or maybe arguing over the nanoseconds one's code takes over the other guy's code. Been in this argument too many times and it's one of the reasons I'm leaving coding for good.
Yeah, I make impossibly small stuff that has to run for years off tiny batteries.FWIW, I'm pretty sure shit like this matters for the stuff that @gee does.
I don't even know what that is.It matters for the kind of real time frame processing I do, too.
Counting bunnies from space.I don't even know what that is.
Damn did you cats get triggered. I didn't really look at that damn code, just throwing in a little fun with an array is simpler/cleaner.Go look at the code I posted.
First one is gonna be as slow or slower than the original if/then/else code that got posted, which will likely compile to the same machine code as a switch statement anyway. Second code was arguably fast but unsafe as shit, and looking at it again, doesn't even work. Third code is even unsafer, and requires a 26^6 (308.9M entry) lookup table.
And the purpose of those three bits of code? to convert a state to an abbreviation. How many times does a function like that actually get hit? Is it going to remove 25% of the servers out of a data center and save megawatts of power to optimize a dumb function like that?
but nooooo, this is a SERIOUS argument about NANOSECONDS