Where were you during the debt limit debacle?
Ahh I thought you meant with the ridiculousness of power here...
Where were you during the debt limit debacle?
With nothing to explain it. I've already said show me where the other western governments have been gridlocked? They haven't. Their style of government is superior to yours.
Have a read.
http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/20/fareeds-take-does-america-need-a-prime-minister/
Well, simply because you interpret something a particular way doesn't make it fact.
1. There are PLENTY of people that would define a successful government as gridlocked
2. Are you suggesting that we can't pass ANY laws? That's simply not the case. I suggest you list your definition of gridlock, while dancing around that obvious fact.
You didn't read the link I posted did you?
lol well it's a decent write up opinion piece (including links) on the pros and cons of both the parliamentary system and the presidential system.
And you didn't read my reply at all, since the pros and cons of each had nothing to do with it.
I did ask you to define gridlock, while dancing around the issue that laws are passed all the time. Proceed...
The link answers your questions. All the while my questions go unanswered.
But the American government has lost the ability to actually implement any policy solutions because of political gridlock
I'm drinking a delicious TommyKnocker Pumpkin Harvest Ale. It sure is gridlocked between mah lips. YUMMM
THAT IS THE POINT.you couldn't work that one out yourself? The two forms of government here, the legislature and the executive branch were gridlocked during the debt limit debacle. Both were unable to pass anything until the final moment. In the end after all the posturing, a rushed policy goes through that was one of the worst policies bought up during the whole debacle.
When the two branches hold enough power the stop the other, you end up with a gridlocked government. You have used this term yourself in the same context. So here I am wondering why you even bought this up.
THAT IS THE POINT.
If we wanted to just make things move fast WE COULD GO FOR A DICTATORSHIP. Eliminate all branches of government, put all the power in the hands of a few or one individual. That sure would speed shit up.
Because they aren't fucking better. In Israel the average parliament lasts 25 months and NO PARTY has ever obtained a majority. Italy has had 2 week parliaments at times, and suffers from severe political paralysis.Great insight there. Really informative.
So you either have a government that fucks around and gets in credit score downgraded, or you go for a dictatorship while completely disregarding the parliamentary system.
Bravo.
They aren't better? That's interesting. A very well reknowned scholar writes that the parliamentary system is better, but fuck that, you know better.
Isn't this conversation all based on opinion? Well.. you'd know better.
I don't believe it is. Though some will see it that way no matter what.