Ontopic Political Poo Flinging

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, the EPA is now making dirty coal legal again, by lifting the 635kg/MWh requirement for coal plants back to 860kg/MWh.

I thought we were going to be doing clean coal now? Y'know, where the carbon emissions get sequestered or scrubbed?

Or was that just some sort of scam?
 
So, the EPA is now making dirty coal legal again, by lifting the 635kg/MWh requirement for coal plants back to 860kg/MWh.

I thought we were going to be doing clean coal now? Y'know, where the carbon emissions get sequestered or scrubbed?

Or was that just some sort of scam?

They're trying to prop up a dying industry so Donnie doesn't look like a liar, again.
 
However, the president is said to have been indifferent once he realised the problem was only likely to become critical after he had completed a possible second term.​
“Yeah, but I won’t be here,”​

The hypocrisy is rich with this one.

Did the Obamacare math formula that did exactly that bug you, or was it OK because he's black? :lol:

Don't let logic get in the way of your answer.

Hey. The proper phrasing would be

“Did the Obamacare math formula that did exactly that bug you, or was it OK because he’s a democrat?”

Careful. You may be considered to be kind of racist the way you worded that.
 
This isn't censorship and it cant be called that because it is clearly laid out in the user agreement what is and what is not allowed to be posted on that website. This is enforcing standards that the user agreed to. That's what there needs to be more of, and what I was alluding to.

Complaining (as Milo is doing) about a standard that you agreed to when you broke the standard is hypocrisy, not censorship.
Having a policy that doesn't allow certain speech is censorship.
 
  • Gravy
Reactions: nukes
Having a policy that doesn't allow certain speech is censorship.
If you voluntarily join something that no one is making you join, agree to the UA, then break that agreement and get kicked off you are not being censored. That is nothing more than the consequences of your actions.

Censorship is if you do nothing wrong and get kicked off.

He made the choice to join Patreon.
 
Having a policy that doesn't allow certain speech is censorship.
There's a fine line that separates curation from censorship.

Milo isn't engaging in speech, he's engaging in performance art.

I think your position on what Milo does speaks to whether what's going on is censorship or not.
 
If you voluntarily join something that no one is making you join, agree to the UA, then break that agreement and get kicked off you are not being censored. That is nothing more than the consequences of your actions.

Censorship is if you do nothing wrong and get kicked off.

He made the choice to join Patreon.
I understand he agreed to the policy, but it's still censorship.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.