Open registration?

Registration

  • Open it

    Votes: 15 83.3%
  • Close it

    Votes: 3 16.7%

  • Total voters
    18
  • Poll closed .
K

kikbot

Guest
#4
I think it would be good. I only see 3 or 4 people posting in the PG anyway. If they act up they can always be sent back. I think the 30 day wait is a good idea if we had more people to keep the PG going.
 

fly

Osharts 11
Oct 1, 2004
64,596
16,144
113
Marklar
33,884.69₥
Steam
mattressfish
#5
kikbot said:
I think it would be good. I only see 3 or 4 people posting in the PG anyway. If they act up they can always be sent back. I think the 30 day wait is a good idea if we had more people to keep the PG going.
And we have decided on a 2 strike rule for totally Useless memebers. I should probably post it here, since I only posted it in the PG...

1st strike: PG'd for 30 days
2st strike (within the 30 days): B7

PG members only get 1 strike (since they are already in the PG).

After being banned, you'll have to wait for registration to open before getting back in... :fly:
 
#6
fly said:
And we have decided on a 2 strike rule for totally Useless memebers. I should probably post it here, since I only posted it in the PG...

1st strike: PG'd for 30 days
2st strike (within the 30 days): B7

PG members only get 1 strike (since they are already in the PG).

After being banned, you'll have to wait for registration to open before getting back in... :fly:
What about the midnight basketball program?
 
#9
WON'T YOU OPEN UP THE BORDER
TO RIVERS RUNNING GREEN?
I HAVE KILO LOADS OF PLASTIC
TO TRADE FOR PUMPKIN SEEDS.

I KNOW FOLKS IN WICHITA AS WELL AS SANTA FE,
ALL VETERANS OF THE TRADE.

OPEN IT UP.
OPEN IT UP.
OPEN IT.

LIVING FOR THE TRADE.

THE MERRY WIVES OF WINDSOR
I SWAPPED FOR CANS OF SPAM
WHILE SIPPING FINE DARJEELING
WITH AN ENGLISHMAN.

I KNOW FOLKS IN LIVERPOOL AS WELL AS IN BOMBAY,
ALL VETERANS OF THE TRADE.

OPEN IT UP.
OPEN IT UP.
OPEN IT.

LIVING FOR THE TRADE.

IN A TENT ON THE CARAVAN ROAD YOU'LL FIND THOSE THINGS YOU THOUGHT WERE GONE.
BARTERED FOR JASMINE AND SILK AND FURS OF FROZEN MASTODONS.

I KNOW FOLKS IN WICHITA AS WELL AS BOMBAY,
ALL VETERANS OF THE TRADE.
 
M

Mondoz

Guest
#12
fly said:
btw, this poll closes tomorrow SO ROCK THE VOTE!!
The poll about the new moderator that you said you were going to start last night must have been open for 20 seconds, because I missed it.
 
S

shockthemonkey

Guest
#16
fly said:
And we have decided on a 2 strike rule for totally Useless memebers. I should probably post it here, since I only posted it in the PG...

1st strike: PG'd for 30 days
2st strike (within the 30 days): B7

PG members only get 1 strike (since they are already in the PG).

After being banned, you'll have to wait for registration to open before getting back in... :fly:
i think having set rules is a good idea and a bad one. if we become too bureaucratic, we're gonna be mired in tards slipping through the red tape.... i think that on top of all this, if senior members/mods feel someone won't add any benefit to the forum, we can just permaban him on that gut feeling.
 

Coqui

Piccolo Pete
Oct 14, 2004
35,569
4,639
113
41
Columbus, OH
Marklar
3,029.24₥
#18
shockthemonkey said:
i think having set rules is a good idea and a bad one. if we become too bureaucratic, we're gonna be mired in tards slipping through the red tape.... i think that on top of all this, if senior members/mods feel someone won't add any benefit to the forum, we can just permaban him on that gut feeling.

I don't see how this can happen though. You don't ban on whether or not you like someone. You ban based on them either flaming, trolling, just in general spamming more so than contributing.
 
S

shockthemonkey

Guest
#19
Coqui said:
Open it up and just be ready. Then no one can complain about it being clique-esque.

I like the two strike rule.
who cares if they care about it being clique-y

edit: they can't complain if we don't let them in
 
S

shockthemonkey

Guest
#20
Coqui said:
I don't see how this can happen though. You don't ban on whether or not you like someone. You ban based on them either flaming, trolling, just in general spamming more so than contributing.
yes, and if a mod gets the feeling they're going to be trouble, he can ban them. this isn't the US government, we don't have a bill of rights and a constitution and we don't need a judge and jury for every tard that signs up. why not just give the mods the power to nip a problem in the bud