kikbot said:I think it would be good. I only see 3 or 4 people posting in the PG anyway. If they act up they can always be sent back. I think the 30 day wait is a good idea if we had more people to keep the PG going.
What about the midnight basketball program?fly said:And we have decided on a 2 strike rule for totally Useless memebers. I should probably post it here, since I only posted it in the PG...
1st strike: PG'd for 30 days
2st strike (within the 30 days): B7
PG members only get 1 strike (since they are already in the PG).
After being banned, you'll have to wait for registration to open before getting back in...![]()
fly said:btw, this poll closes tomorrow SO ROCK THE VOTE!!
CletusJones said:let's open it up for now and see what kind of cheese falls from the heavens.
y halo thar sir. it is customary of this forum to post scantily clad photos of attractive women as soon as your registration has been approved.WeLandedOnTheMoon! said:Hello thar!![]()
i think having set rules is a good idea and a bad one. if we become too bureaucratic, we're gonna be mired in tards slipping through the red tape.... i think that on top of all this, if senior members/mods feel someone won't add any benefit to the forum, we can just permaban him on that gut feeling.fly said:And we have decided on a 2 strike rule for totally Useless memebers. I should probably post it here, since I only posted it in the PG...
1st strike: PG'd for 30 days
2st strike (within the 30 days): B7
PG members only get 1 strike (since they are already in the PG).
After being banned, you'll have to wait for registration to open before getting back in...![]()
shockthemonkey said:i think having set rules is a good idea and a bad one. if we become too bureaucratic, we're gonna be mired in tards slipping through the red tape.... i think that on top of all this, if senior members/mods feel someone won't add any benefit to the forum, we can just permaban him on that gut feeling.
who cares if they care about it being clique-yCoqui said:Open it up and just be ready. Then no one can complain about it being clique-esque.
I like the two strike rule.
yes, and if a mod gets the feeling they're going to be trouble, he can ban them. this isn't the US government, we don't have a bill of rights and a constitution and we don't need a judge and jury for every tard that signs up. why not just give the mods the power to nip a problem in the budCoqui said:I don't see how this can happen though. You don't ban on whether or not you like someone. You ban based on them either flaming, trolling, just in general spamming more so than contributing.