Hawt No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act

plot

Morning Boehner
Oct 16, 2006
20,031
4,165
323
kansas city
No, because people will always be between jobs. Doesn't mean there aren't alot of jobs out there right now that people won't take because they think its beneath them...
 

plot

Morning Boehner
Oct 16, 2006
20,031
4,165
323
kansas city
The point of that statement ara, is government should be run and held responsible as a bussiness... When a bussiness doesn't have money, it cuts spending our shuts down. They don't try starting new programs...
 

my little brony

Keep Being A Little Bitch
Oct 15, 2004
34,952
18,763
823
You're god damn right I would kill anyone before someone in my family died from starvation.

even though that person has done nothing against you? even if that person is the father of a child who will starve without help?

if you're in a position where your family would die of starvation then you have failed as a father in the first place and should have lost your child to a better family long ago. especially if you'd be willing to sacrifice one life to save another when there are a multitude of options available for you to take. great example you'd set for your child, too. it's ok to hurt others as long as it benefits you, son.
 

my little brony

Keep Being A Little Bitch
Oct 15, 2004
34,952
18,763
823
Sure.. If they are hiring.. It's gonna be a tough time if everyone who used to just collect a welfare check is now out there also looking for a job.

ok first of all, there's no such thing as a simple welfare check. that's now how it works. there are programs that fall under the generic term of welfare but there is no all-encompassing "Welfare Program" to receive a check from. second, it's almost always restricted to those with children. third, most of those people are already looking for jobs. most of the rest are already working under the table. if those programs were cut you wouldn't see some drastic increase of job hunters.
 

Atan Nolme

Flaccid Member
Oct 14, 2004
6,388
12
0
Karningul,Eriador, Endor
The point of that statement ara, is government should be run and held responsible as a business... When a business doesn't have money, it cuts spending our shuts down. They don't try starting new programs...

I won't disagree with you that all levels of government could be a lot more efficient, too including my my pet area (Defense Department). IF we limited the federal government to what is actually written in the Constitution then the federal government would need a whole lot less money.
 

OzSTEEZ

¡ɟɟo ʞɔnɟ ʇunɔ 'ᴉO
Nov 11, 2008
35,272
9,368
473
40
Oz
ok first of all, there's no such thing as a simple welfare check. that's now how it works. there are programs that fall under the generic term of welfare but there is no all-encompassing "Welfare Program" to receive a check from. second, it's almost always restricted to those with children. third, most of those people are already looking for jobs. most of the rest are already working under the table. if those programs were cut you wouldn't see some drastic increase of job hunters.

Knew all that already, and yes, there would be a dramatic increase.
 

plot

Morning Boehner
Oct 16, 2006
20,031
4,165
323
kansas city
Lets just keep bribing them to leave us be... great idea. Problem is, we're cultivating new crops of people who don't contribute to society (because as you put it, they'll either be on welfare, or they will be robbing us), so why not cut them off, see what happens, ride out the wave, and in a few generations that element will be done.
 

APRIL

Feel Free to Pee on Me
Sep 30, 2004
103,151
37,828
1,823
Houston
The sky is muthafucking black with electric blue polka dots. TRY TO PROVE ME WRONG BITCHES.
 

OzSTEEZ

¡ɟɟo ʞɔnɟ ʇunɔ 'ᴉO
Nov 11, 2008
35,272
9,368
473
40
Oz
The sky is muthafucking black with electric blue polka dots. TRY TO PROVE ME WRONG BITCHES.

Wrong.

blueskylarge.jpg
 

APRIL

Feel Free to Pee on Me
Sep 30, 2004
103,151
37,828
1,823
Houston
Prove to me that picture was taken of OUR sky. APA reference needed as well.